2012•arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

Adding one edge to planar graphs makes crossing number and 1-planarity\n hard

Sergio Cabello, Bojan Mohar

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

A graph is near-planar if it can be obtained from a planar graph by adding an\nedge. We show the surprising fact that it is NP-hard to compute the crossing\nnumber of near-planar graphs. A graph is 1-planar if it has a drawing where\nevery edge is crossed by at most one other edge. We show that it is NP-hard to\ndecide whether a given near-planar graph is 1-planar. The main idea in both\nreductions is to consider the problem of simultaneously drawing two planar\ngraphs inside a disk, with some of its vertices fixed at the boundary of the\ndisk. This leads to the concept of anchored embedding, which is of independent\ninterest. As an interesting consequence we obtain a new, geometric proof of\nNP-completeness of the crossing number problem, even when restricted to cubic\ngraphs. This resolves a question of Hlin\\v{e}n\\'y.\n

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A graph is near-planar if it can be obtained from a planar graph by adding an\nedge. We show the surprising fact that it is NP-hard to compute the crossing\nnumber of near-planar graphs. A graph is 1-planar if it has a drawing where\nevery edge is crossed by at most one other edge. We show that it is NP-hard to\ndecide whether a given near-planar graph is 1-planar. The main idea in both\nreductions is to consider the problem of simultaneously drawing two planar\ngraphs inside a disk, with some of its vertices fixed at the boundary of the\ndisk. This leads to the concept of anchored embedding, which is of independent\ninterest. As an interesting consequence we obtain a new, geometric proof of\nNP-completeness of the crossing number problem, even when restricted to cubic\ngraphs. This resolves a question of Hlin\\v{e}n\\'y.\n

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A graph is near-planar if it can be obtained from a planar graph by adding an\nedge. We show the surprising fact that it is NP-hard to compute the crossing\nnumber of near-planar graphs. A graph is 1-planar if it has a drawing where\nevery edge is crossed by at most one other edge. We show that it is NP-hard to\ndecide whether a given near-planar graph is 1-planar. The main idea in both\nreductions is to consider the problem of simultaneously drawing two planar\ngraphs inside a disk, with some of its vertices fixed at the boundary of the\ndisk. This leads to the concept of anchored embedding, which is of independent\ninterest. As an interesting consequence we obtain a new, geometric proof of\nNP-completeness of the crossing number problem, even when restricted to cubic\ngraphs. This resolves a question of Hlin\\v{e}n\\'y.\n

Key concepts: Book embedding, Crossing number (knot theory), Planar graph, Planarity testing, Combinatorics, Planar straight-line graph, Mathematics, 1-planar graph

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Adding one edge to planar graphs makes crossing number and 1-planarity\n hard — Research Paper | ScholarLens