Adding one edge to planar graphs makes crossing number and 1-planarity\n hard
Sergio Cabello, Bojan Mohar
Abstract
Open-access reader
Sergio Cabello, Bojan Mohar
Abstract
Open-access reader
A graph is near-planar if it can be obtained from a planar graph by adding an\nedge. We show the surprising fact that it is NP-hard to compute the crossing\nnumber of near-planar graphs. A graph is 1-planar if it has a drawing where\nevery edge is crossed by at most one other edge. We show that it is NP-hard to\ndecide whether a given near-planar graph is 1-planar. The main idea in both\nreductions is to consider the problem of simultaneously drawing two planar\ngraphs inside a disk, with some of its vertices fixed at the boundary of the\ndisk. This leads to the concept of anchored embedding, which is of independent\ninterest. As an interesting consequence we obtain a new, geometric proof of\nNP-completeness of the crossing number problem, even when restricted to cubic\ngraphs. This resolves a question of Hlin\\v{e}n\\'y.\n
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A graph is near-planar if it can be obtained from a planar graph by adding an\nedge. We show the surprising fact that it is NP-hard to compute the crossing\nnumber of near-planar graphs. A graph is 1-planar if it has a drawing where\nevery edge is crossed by at most one other edge. We show that it is NP-hard to\ndecide whether a given near-planar graph is 1-planar. The main idea in both\nreductions is to consider the problem of simultaneously drawing two planar\ngraphs inside a disk, with some of its vertices fixed at the boundary of the\ndisk. This leads to the concept of anchored embedding, which is of independent\ninterest. As an interesting consequence we obtain a new, geometric proof of\nNP-completeness of the crossing number problem, even when restricted to cubic\ngraphs. This resolves a question of Hlin\\v{e}n\\'y.\n
Key concepts: Book embedding, Crossing number (knot theory), Planar graph, Planarity testing, Combinatorics, Planar straight-line graph, Mathematics, 1-planar graph