2022β€’International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCESOpen access

Comparisons of Bayes factors for πŸπŸ’ full, fractional, and reduced factorial designs

R. Vijayaragunathan, M. R. Srinivasan

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The effect of factors in full and fractional factorial designs is being studied ubiquitously in all fields of science and engineering. At times, researchers would want to gather additional information than the fractional factorial design provided, there is no restriction to conducting more experimental runs. In this study, we propose a reduced fractional factorial design consisting of all significant factors. This paper illustrates the effectiveness of factors through real data application and simulation by comparing the full factorial, reduced factorial, and fractional factorial designs. The actual weightage of the main/interaction effects in these three designs was found by identifying and quantifying the Bayes factors through the simulation datasets. It is observed that the reduced factorial design produces better results when there are no constraints to select or add factors to the model.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effect of factors in full and fractional factorial designs is being studied ubiquitously in all fields of science and engineering. At times, researchers would want to gather additional information than the fractional factorial design provided, there is no restriction to conducting more experimental runs. In this study, we propose a reduced fractional factorial design consisting of all significant factors. This paper illustrates the effectiveness of factors through real data application and simulation by comparing the full factorial, reduced factorial, and fractional factorial designs. The actual weightage of the main/interaction effects in these three designs was found by identifying and quantifying the Bayes factors through the simulation datasets. It is observed that the reduced factorial design produces better results when there are no constraints to select or add factors to the model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effect of factors in full and fractional factorial designs is being studied ubiquitously in all fields of science and engineering. At times, researchers would want to gather additional information than the fractional factorial design provided, there is no restriction to conducting more experimental runs. In this study, we propose a reduced fractional factorial design consisting of all significant factors. This paper illustrates the effectiveness of factors through real data application and simulation by comparing the full factorial, reduced factorial, and fractional factorial designs. The actual weightage of the main/interaction effects in these three designs was found by identifying and quantifying the Bayes factors through the simulation datasets. It is observed that the reduced factorial design produces better results when there are no constraints to select or add factors to the model.

Key concepts: Fractional factorial design, Factorial experiment, Factorial, Plackett–Burman design, Bayes' theorem, Mathematics, Factorial analysis, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparisons of Bayes factors for πŸπŸ’ full, fractional, and reduced factorial designs β€” Research Paper | ScholarLens