2013arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

On the Decidability and Complexity of Some Fragments of Metric Temporal\n Logic

Khushraj Madnani, Shankara Narayanan Krishna, Paritosh K. Pandya

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Metric Temporal Logic, $\\mtlfull$ is amongst the most studied real-time\nlogics. It exhibits considerable diversity in expressiveness and decidability\nproperties based on the permitted set of modalities and the nature of time\ninterval constraints $I$. \\oomit{The classical results of Alur and Henzinger\nshowed that $\\mtlfull$ is undecidable where as $\\mitl$ which uses only\nnon-singular intervals $NS$ is decidable. In a surprizing result, Ouaknine and\nWorrell showed that the satisfiability of $\\mtl$ is decidable over finite\npointwise models, albeit with NPR decision complexity, whereas it remains\nundecidable for infinite pointwise models or for continuous time.} In this\npaper, we sharpen the decidability results by showing that the satisfiability\nof $\\mtlsns$ (where $NS$ denotes non-singular intervals) is also decidable over\nfinite pointwise strictly monotonic time. We give a satisfiability preserving\nreduction from the logic $\\mtlsns$ to decidable logic $\\mtl$ of Ouaknine and\nWorrell using the technique of temporal projections. We also investigate the\ndecidability of unary fragment $\\mtlfullunary$ (a question posed by A.\nRabinovich) and show that $\\mtlfut$ over continuous time as well as\n$\\mtlfullunary$ over finite pointwise time are both undecidable. Moreover,\n$\\mathsf{MTL}^{pw}[\\fut_I]$ over finite pointwise models already has NPR lower\nbound for satisfiability checking. We also compare the expressive powers of\nsome of these fragments using the technique of EF games for $\\mathsf{MTL}$.\n

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Metric Temporal Logic, $\\mtlfull$ is amongst the most studied real-time\nlogics. It exhibits considerable diversity in expressiveness and decidability\nproperties based on the permitted set of modalities and the nature of time\ninterval constraints $I$. \\oomit{The classical results of Alur and Henzinger\nshowed that $\\mtlfull$ is undecidable where as $\\mitl$ which uses only\nnon-singular intervals $NS$ is decidable. In a surprizing result, Ouaknine and\nWorrell showed that the satisfiability of $\\mtl$ is decidable over finite\npointwise models, albeit with NPR decision complexity, whereas it remains\nundecidable for infinite pointwise models or for continuous time.} In this\npaper, we sharpen the decidability results by showing that the satisfiability\nof $\\mtlsns$ (where $NS$ denotes non-singular intervals) is also decidable over\nfinite pointwise strictly monotonic time. We give a satisfiability preserving\nreduction from the logic $\\mtlsns$ to decidable logic $\\mtl$ of Ouaknine and\nWorrell using the technique of temporal projections. We also investigate the\ndecidability of unary fragment $\\mtlfullunary$ (a question posed by A.\nRabinovich) and show that $\\mtlfut$ over continuous time as well as\n$\\mtlfullunary$ over finite pointwise time are both undecidable. Moreover,\n$\\mathsf{MTL}^{pw}[\\fut_I]$ over finite pointwise models already has NPR lower\nbound for satisfiability checking. We also compare the expressive powers of\nsome of these fragments using the technique of EF games for $\\mathsf{MTL}$.\n

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Metric Temporal Logic, $\\mtlfull$ is amongst the most studied real-time\nlogics. It exhibits considerable diversity in expressiveness and decidability\nproperties based on the permitted set of modalities and the nature of time\ninterval constraints $I$. \\oomit{The classical results of Alur and Henzinger\nshowed that $\\mtlfull$ is undecidable where as $\\mitl$ which uses only\nnon-singular intervals $NS$ is decidable. In a surprizing result, Ouaknine and\nWorrell showed that the satisfiability of $\\mtl$ is decidable over finite\npointwise models, albeit with NPR decision complexity, whereas it remains\nundecidable for infinite pointwise models or for continuous time.} In this\npaper, we sharpen the decidability results by showing that the satisfiability\nof $\\mtlsns$ (where $NS$ denotes non-singular intervals) is also decidable over\nfinite pointwise strictly monotonic time. We give a satisfiability preserving\nreduction from the logic $\\mtlsns$ to decidable logic $\\mtl$ of Ouaknine and\nWorrell using the technique of temporal projections. We also investigate the\ndecidability of unary fragment $\\mtlfullunary$ (a question posed by A.\nRabinovich) and show that $\\mtlfut$ over continuous time as well as\n$\\mtlfullunary$ over finite pointwise time are both undecidable. Moreover,\n$\\mathsf{MTL}^{pw}[\\fut_I]$ over finite pointwise models already has NPR lower\nbound for satisfiability checking. We also compare the expressive powers of\nsome of these fragments using the technique of EF games for $\\mathsf{MTL}$.\n

Key concepts: Undecidable problem, Decidability, Pointwise, Satisfiability, Discrete mathematics, Boolean satisfiability problem, Mathematics, Unary operation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Decidability and Complexity of Some Fragments of Metric Temporal\n Logic — Research Paper | ScholarLens