20222022 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC)Requires access

A Comparison of the S-parameter Extrapolation Methods

Sherman Shan Chen, Zhifei Xu, Armin Tajali, Brian Holden

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

This article investigates five s-parameter extrapolation methods, i.e., Polynomial, Polynomial-Logarithmic, Linear, Static, and Zero-padding. The s-parameters extrapolated using these methods, along with the resulted impedance profiles and eye-diagrams are compared. The study reveals three key observations: First, in contrast to the conventional recommendation that s-parameter extrapolation should be avoided, extrapolation can be doable also useful provided the original s-parameter fulfilling certain conditions. Second, the widely adopted Static method and the Zero-padding method (when extrapolation is used) can exhibit less optimal performances in comparison to other extrapolation methods. Third, which extrapolation method to choose is a case by case decision to make. Practitioners need to carefully check the s-parameters before and after extrapolation in order to ensure the meaningful results can be obtained from the extrapolation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article investigates five s-parameter extrapolation methods, i.e., Polynomial, Polynomial-Logarithmic, Linear, Static, and Zero-padding. The s-parameters extrapolated using these methods, along with the resulted impedance profiles and eye-diagrams are compared. The study reveals three key observations: First, in contrast to the conventional recommendation that s-parameter extrapolation should be avoided, extrapolation can be doable also useful provided the original s-parameter fulfilling certain conditions. Second, the widely adopted Static method and the Zero-padding method (when extrapolation is used) can exhibit less optimal performances in comparison to other extrapolation methods. Third, which extrapolation method to choose is a case by case decision to make. Practitioners need to carefully check the s-parameters before and after extrapolation in order to ensure the meaningful results can be obtained from the extrapolation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article investigates five s-parameter extrapolation methods, i.e., Polynomial, Polynomial-Logarithmic, Linear, Static, and Zero-padding. The s-parameters extrapolated using these methods, along with the resulted impedance profiles and eye-diagrams are compared. The study reveals three key observations: First, in contrast to the conventional recommendation that s-parameter extrapolation should be avoided, extrapolation can be doable also useful provided the original s-parameter fulfilling certain conditions. Second, the widely adopted Static method and the Zero-padding method (when extrapolation is used) can exhibit less optimal performances in comparison to other extrapolation methods. Third, which extrapolation method to choose is a case by case decision to make. Practitioners need to carefully check the s-parameters before and after extrapolation in order to ensure the meaningful results can be obtained from the extrapolation.

Key concepts: Extrapolation, Logarithm, Polynomial, Computer science, Applied mathematics, Zero (linguistics), Padding, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of the S-parameter Extrapolation Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens