2022•International Journal of Health SciencesOpen access

Accuracy of digital occlusal records versus conventional mechanical methods

Mahmoud Z. Attia, Marwa Wahsh, N Z Fahmy, Ahmad Aboelfadl, M Zohdy

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Background: The stomatognathic system includes the relationship between teeth, masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints. Achieving Occlusal stability via occlusal equilibration is mandatory for healthy stomatognathic system. Aim: Assessment of accuracy of two digital occlusal records and mechanical records using semi adjustable articulator through ob jective and subjective methods)Methodology: 7 patients were evaluated with total of 21 PMMA FDP to restore missing 1st permanent molar using different occlusal recording methods. Group (C) conventional mechanical articulator, Group (M) mathematically Simulated Articulator & Group (P) patient-specific motion. Occlusense and articulating paper was used to analyze occlusal accuracy and patient satisfaction was done via questionnaire. Results: There was significant in postoperative records in all groups as P < 0.05 by using Paired t-test, while there was insignificant difference between all groups as P > 0.05 by using One Way ANOVA test, in patients’ satisfaction, comparison between different groups performed by using Chi-square test which demonstrated that Group (P) revealed the best results. Moreover, correlation between occlusal forces analysis & patient satisfaction revealed insignificant correlation (P<0.05) Conclusion: The three methods of occlusal recording techniques showed comparable results

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The stomatognathic system includes the relationship between teeth, masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints. Achieving Occlusal stability via occlusal equilibration is mandatory for healthy stomatognathic system. Aim: Assessment of accuracy of two digital occlusal records and mechanical records using semi adjustable articulator through ob jective and subjective methods)Methodology: 7 patients were evaluated with total of 21 PMMA FDP to restore missing 1st permanent molar using different occlusal recording methods. Group (C) conventional mechanical articulator, Group (M) mathematically Simulated Articulator & Group (P) patient-specific motion. Occlusense and articulating paper was used to analyze occlusal accuracy and patient satisfaction was done via questionnaire. Results: There was significant in postoperative records in all groups as P < 0.05 by using Paired t-test, while there was insignificant difference between all groups as P > 0.05 by using One Way ANOVA test, in patients’ satisfaction, comparison between different groups performed by using Chi-square test which demonstrated that Group (P) revealed the best results. Moreover, correlation between occlusal forces analysis & patient satisfaction revealed insignificant correlation (P<0.05) Conclusion: The three methods of occlusal recording techniques showed comparable results

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The stomatognathic system includes the relationship between teeth, masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints. Achieving Occlusal stability via occlusal equilibration is mandatory for healthy stomatognathic system. Aim: Assessment of accuracy of two digital occlusal records and mechanical records using semi adjustable articulator through ob jective and subjective methods)Methodology: 7 patients were evaluated with total of 21 PMMA FDP to restore missing 1st permanent molar using different occlusal recording methods. Group (C) conventional mechanical articulator, Group (M) mathematically Simulated Articulator & Group (P) patient-specific motion. Occlusense and articulating paper was used to analyze occlusal accuracy and patient satisfaction was done via questionnaire. Results: There was significant in postoperative records in all groups as P < 0.05 by using Paired t-test, while there was insignificant difference between all groups as P > 0.05 by using One Way ANOVA test, in patients’ satisfaction, comparison between different groups performed by using Chi-square test which demonstrated that Group (P) revealed the best results. Moreover, correlation between occlusal forces analysis & patient satisfaction revealed insignificant correlation (P<0.05) Conclusion: The three methods of occlusal recording techniques showed comparable results

Key concepts: Articulator, Stomatognathic system, Orthodontics, Masticatory force, Medicine, Significant difference, Bite force quotient, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Accuracy of digital occlusal records versus conventional mechanical methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens