20222022 IEEE 95th Vehicular Technology Conference: (VTC2022-Spring)Requires access

Measurement-based Evaluation of Uplink Throughput Prediction

Mate Boban, Chunxu Jiao, Mohamed Gharba

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Motivated by the teleoperation and local map sharing vehicular communication use cases, we investigate whether uplink throughput can be predicted by different machine learning approaches. First, we perform measurements of the vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) uplink throughput in Munich, Germany. Then, we use the collected measurements to evaluate whether linear regression (LR), deep neural network (DNN), and random forest (RF) can predict the uplink throughput. Our results show that, while very easy to train, LR is overly simple in describing the relationship of the input features and the predicted uplink throughput. On the other hand, DNN and RF can provide a very good prediction of uplink throughput (below 0.5 Mbps mean absolute error for a 40 Mbps uplink connection), while requiring longer training. Irrespective of the employed model, our results show that the best indicator of uplink throughput is signal to interference and noise ratio (SINR). When location information is added to SINR, the prediction error can be further reduced, albeit slightly. In the absence of SINR, location information is the second best in predicting uplink throughput. However, it can be employed only for locations that were available in the training dataset. On the other hand, SINR allows for generalization to locations different to those observed in the training dataset.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Motivated by the teleoperation and local map sharing vehicular communication use cases, we investigate whether uplink throughput can be predicted by different machine learning approaches. First, we perform measurements of the vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) uplink throughput in Munich, Germany. Then, we use the collected measurements to evaluate whether linear regression (LR), deep neural network (DNN), and random forest (RF) can predict the uplink throughput. Our results show that, while very easy to train, LR is overly simple in describing the relationship of the input features and the predicted uplink throughput. On the other hand, DNN and RF can provide a very good prediction of uplink throughput (below 0.5 Mbps mean absolute error for a 40 Mbps uplink connection), while requiring longer training. Irrespective of the employed model, our results show that the best indicator of uplink throughput is signal to interference and noise ratio (SINR). When location information is added to SINR, the prediction error can be further reduced, albeit slightly. In the absence of SINR, location information is the second best in predicting uplink throughput. However, it can be employed only for locations that were available in the training dataset. On the other hand, SINR allows for generalization to locations different to those observed in the training dataset.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Motivated by the teleoperation and local map sharing vehicular communication use cases, we investigate whether uplink throughput can be predicted by different machine learning approaches. First, we perform measurements of the vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) uplink throughput in Munich, Germany. Then, we use the collected measurements to evaluate whether linear regression (LR), deep neural network (DNN), and random forest (RF) can predict the uplink throughput. Our results show that, while very easy to train, LR is overly simple in describing the relationship of the input features and the predicted uplink throughput. On the other hand, DNN and RF can provide a very good prediction of uplink throughput (below 0.5 Mbps mean absolute error for a 40 Mbps uplink connection), while requiring longer training. Irrespective of the employed model, our results show that the best indicator of uplink throughput is signal to interference and noise ratio (SINR). When location information is added to SINR, the prediction error can be further reduced, albeit slightly. In the absence of SINR, location information is the second best in predicting uplink throughput. However, it can be employed only for locations that were available in the training dataset. On the other hand, SINR allows for generalization to locations different to those observed in the training dataset.

Key concepts: Telecommunications link, Throughput, Computer science, Interference (communication), Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging), Computer network, Real-time computing, Wireless

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurement-based Evaluation of Uplink Throughput Prediction — Research Paper | ScholarLens