2018Mustansiria Dental JournalOpen access

Clinical assessment of position of impacted lower third molars and their indications for extraction

Yahya A. Ali, Aqeel Ibarheem Ibarheem, Taha Yaseen Hamad

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the position of impacted lower thirdmolars, the indications for extraction, and the post-operative complications. Recordsof patients who attended Misan general hospital between March 2008 and April 2009for surgical removal of mandibular third molars.The angulation type and depth of impaction were determined by reviewing theorthopantomograms. A total of 140 impacted teeth were surgically extracted from 132patients (69 males, 63 females). The reasons for extraction include recurrentpericoronitis (55%) followed by caries (25%) and prophylactic purposes (20%).Mesioangular impactions accounted for (49.29 %) and Level 1 position ofimpaction accounted for (65%) of extractions. 40 complications (28.57%), includingpersistent pain and swelling, infection, dry socket, Trismus and ulceration werereported . Persistent pain and swelling was the most common complications followedby infection.There was no significant relationship between the angulation, level of impactionand the occurrence of complications. Mesioangular type and Level A position ofimpaction were the most common impaction. Although the association was notsignificant, high frequency of post-operative complications was observed inmesioangular, horizontal and level A position of impaction.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to assess the position of impacted lower thirdmolars, the indications for extraction, and the post-operative complications. Recordsof patients who attended Misan general hospital between March 2008 and April 2009for surgical removal of mandibular third molars.The angulation type and depth of impaction were determined by reviewing theorthopantomograms. A total of 140 impacted teeth were surgically extracted from 132patients (69 males, 63 females). The reasons for extraction include recurrentpericoronitis (55%) followed by caries (25%) and prophylactic purposes (20%).Mesioangular impactions accounted for (49.29 %) and Level 1 position ofimpaction accounted for (65%) of extractions. 40 complications (28.57%), includingpersistent pain and swelling, infection, dry socket, Trismus and ulceration werereported . Persistent pain and swelling was the most common complications followedby infection.There was no significant relationship between the angulation, level of impactionand the occurrence of complications. Mesioangular type and Level A position ofimpaction were the most common impaction. Although the association was notsignificant, high frequency of post-operative complications was observed inmesioangular, horizontal and level A position of impaction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the position of impacted lower thirdmolars, the indications for extraction, and the post-operative complications. Recordsof patients who attended Misan general hospital between March 2008 and April 2009for surgical removal of mandibular third molars.The angulation type and depth of impaction were determined by reviewing theorthopantomograms. A total of 140 impacted teeth were surgically extracted from 132patients (69 males, 63 females). The reasons for extraction include recurrentpericoronitis (55%) followed by caries (25%) and prophylactic purposes (20%).Mesioangular impactions accounted for (49.29 %) and Level 1 position ofimpaction accounted for (65%) of extractions. 40 complications (28.57%), includingpersistent pain and swelling, infection, dry socket, Trismus and ulceration werereported . Persistent pain and swelling was the most common complications followedby infection.There was no significant relationship between the angulation, level of impactionand the occurrence of complications. Mesioangular type and Level A position ofimpaction were the most common impaction. Although the association was notsignificant, high frequency of post-operative complications was observed inmesioangular, horizontal and level A position of impaction.

Key concepts: Impaction, Trismus, Medicine, Molar, Dentistry, Impacted tooth, Dry socket, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical assessment of position of impacted lower third molars and their indications for extraction — Research Paper | ScholarLens