2022Economic Research-Ekonomska IstraživanjaOpen access

Does regional value chain participation affect global value chain positions? Evidence from China

Lina Yu, Yaxiu Sun, Xinran Liu, Tao Wang

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

Does participation in the ASEAN-China regional value chain (RVC) affect China’s manufacturing enterprises’ global value chain (GVC) positions in the context of the establishment of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA)? In this paper, we discuss the theoretical mechanisms and impacts of RVC participation on GVC positions and use an input-output model to decompose the gross exports of China by different sources and destinations. The model measures China’s manufacturing industries’ total, upstream and downstream participation within the ASEAN-China regional value chain. Using panel data from the OECD for 2005 to 2015, the empirical results show that (1) the participation of China’s manufacturing industries in the RVC is conducive to improvement in their GVC positions, (2) moving to more upstream can indeed promote the GVC positions of enterprises, and (3) in contrast to labour-intensive and capital-intensive manufacturing, knowledge-intensive manufacturing in upstream activities of the RVC contributes the most to GVC positions. It is suggested that China should develop knowledge-oriented industries and move to more upstream of the ASEAN-China RVC to raise manufacturing industries’ positions in the GVC.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Does participation in the ASEAN-China regional value chain (RVC) affect China’s manufacturing enterprises’ global value chain (GVC) positions in the context of the establishment of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA)? In this paper, we discuss the theoretical mechanisms and impacts of RVC participation on GVC positions and use an input-output model to decompose the gross exports of China by different sources and destinations. The model measures China’s manufacturing industries’ total, upstream and downstream participation within the ASEAN-China regional value chain. Using panel data from the OECD for 2005 to 2015, the empirical results show that (1) the participation of China’s manufacturing industries in the RVC is conducive to improvement in their GVC positions, (2) moving to more upstream can indeed promote the GVC positions of enterprises, and (3) in contrast to labour-intensive and capital-intensive manufacturing, knowledge-intensive manufacturing in upstream activities of the RVC contributes the most to GVC positions. It is suggested that China should develop knowledge-oriented industries and move to more upstream of the ASEAN-China RVC to raise manufacturing industries’ positions in the GVC.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Does participation in the ASEAN-China regional value chain (RVC) affect China’s manufacturing enterprises’ global value chain (GVC) positions in the context of the establishment of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA)? In this paper, we discuss the theoretical mechanisms and impacts of RVC participation on GVC positions and use an input-output model to decompose the gross exports of China by different sources and destinations. The model measures China’s manufacturing industries’ total, upstream and downstream participation within the ASEAN-China regional value chain. Using panel data from the OECD for 2005 to 2015, the empirical results show that (1) the participation of China’s manufacturing industries in the RVC is conducive to improvement in their GVC positions, (2) moving to more upstream can indeed promote the GVC positions of enterprises, and (3) in contrast to labour-intensive and capital-intensive manufacturing, knowledge-intensive manufacturing in upstream activities of the RVC contributes the most to GVC positions. It is suggested that China should develop knowledge-oriented industries and move to more upstream of the ASEAN-China RVC to raise manufacturing industries’ positions in the GVC.

Key concepts: Upstream (networking), China, Global value chain, Business, Context (archaeology), Downstream (manufacturing), Panel data, Manufacturing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does regional value chain participation affect global value chain positions? Evidence from China — Research Paper | ScholarLens