2022Unpublished venueRequires access

Spelling and Punctuation

Robert Fuchs

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the currently available empirical evidence on spelling and punctuation in Philippine English (PhE), including recent diachronic change. While PhE overwhelmingly follows American English (AmE) in spelling and punctuation, a diachronic perspective shows that, in recent decades, the existing, small but noticeable proportion of cases following British spelling and punctuation norms has become even smaller. From a broader perspective, the apparent shift toward more consistent adherence to AmE spelling and punctuation also begs the question of norm orientation. The chapter uses the terms ‘British’ and ‘American’ to refer to specific spelling variants, which is grounded in a sense of relative differences in frequency in few varieties, it might not necessarily be the case that users of PhE perceive these variants as British or American.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the currently available empirical evidence on spelling and punctuation in Philippine English (PhE), including recent diachronic change. While PhE overwhelmingly follows American English (AmE) in spelling and punctuation, a diachronic perspective shows that, in recent decades, the existing, small but noticeable proportion of cases following British spelling and punctuation norms has become even smaller. From a broader perspective, the apparent shift toward more consistent adherence to AmE spelling and punctuation also begs the question of norm orientation. The chapter uses the terms ‘British’ and ‘American’ to refer to specific spelling variants, which is grounded in a sense of relative differences in frequency in few varieties, it might not necessarily be the case that users of PhE perceive these variants as British or American.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the currently available empirical evidence on spelling and punctuation in Philippine English (PhE), including recent diachronic change. While PhE overwhelmingly follows American English (AmE) in spelling and punctuation, a diachronic perspective shows that, in recent decades, the existing, small but noticeable proportion of cases following British spelling and punctuation norms has become even smaller. From a broader perspective, the apparent shift toward more consistent adherence to AmE spelling and punctuation also begs the question of norm orientation. The chapter uses the terms ‘British’ and ‘American’ to refer to specific spelling variants, which is grounded in a sense of relative differences in frequency in few varieties, it might not necessarily be the case that users of PhE perceive these variants as British or American.

Key concepts: Spelling, Punctuation, Perspective (graphical), Linguistics, Norm (philosophy), Psychology, Computer science, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spelling and Punctuation — Research Paper | ScholarLens