2022Applied Physiology Nutrition and MetabolismOpen access

Validation of accelerometer placement to capture energy expenditure using doubly labeled water

Ryan J. Dougherty, Fangyu Liu, Lacey Etzkorn, Amal A. Wanigatunga, Peter J. Walter, Nicolas D. Knuth, Jennifer A. Schrack, Luigi Ferrucci

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

This study compared accelerometer-measured physical activity by body placement to daily total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity energy expenditure (AEE) measured using doubly labeled water (DLW). Forty-nine adult participants wore accelerometers placed on the nondominant wrist, dominant wrist, and chest while also undergoing DLW assessments. In adjusted models, wrist-measured physical activity ( p < 0.05), but not chest-measured physical activity ( p > 0.05), was associated with TEE and AEE and explained a significant amount of variance that was not explained by age, sex, height, or body composition ( R2 change = 0.04–0.08; all p < 0.05). Accelerometer placement location is an important consideration when using accelerometry to provide information about energy expenditure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study compared accelerometer-measured physical activity by body placement to daily total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity energy expenditure (AEE) measured using doubly labeled water (DLW). Forty-nine adult participants wore accelerometers placed on the nondominant wrist, dominant wrist, and chest while also undergoing DLW assessments. In adjusted models, wrist-measured physical activity ( p < 0.05), but not chest-measured physical activity ( p > 0.05), was associated with TEE and AEE and explained a significant amount of variance that was not explained by age, sex, height, or body composition ( R2 change = 0.04–0.08; all p < 0.05). Accelerometer placement location is an important consideration when using accelerometry to provide information about energy expenditure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study compared accelerometer-measured physical activity by body placement to daily total energy expenditure (TEE) and activity energy expenditure (AEE) measured using doubly labeled water (DLW). Forty-nine adult participants wore accelerometers placed on the nondominant wrist, dominant wrist, and chest while also undergoing DLW assessments. In adjusted models, wrist-measured physical activity ( p < 0.05), but not chest-measured physical activity ( p > 0.05), was associated with TEE and AEE and explained a significant amount of variance that was not explained by age, sex, height, or body composition ( R2 change = 0.04–0.08; all p < 0.05). Accelerometer placement location is an important consideration when using accelerometry to provide information about energy expenditure.

Key concepts: Doubly labeled water, Accelerometer, Energy expenditure, Physical activity, Wrist, Medicine, Total energy expenditure, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Validation of accelerometer placement to capture energy expenditure using doubly labeled water — Research Paper | ScholarLens