2021•International Journal of Health SciencesOpen access

Study of prevalence and pattern of impacted mandibular third molar in a tertiary care centre

Manoharapandian Parvatha Varthini, Ramaiah Manjunathmandhiradoss, D Gokul, Thommeni Maria Singam, Francis Ajay

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Aim: To study the prevalence, pattern and postoperative complications of impacted third molars based on Pell and Gregory and Winter's classification. Methods: This retrospective study was undertaken on 300 patients in the Thoothukudi Government medical college hospital in the department of dental surgery. Patients diagnosed with impacted mandibular third molars and treated surgically under local anesthesia were included in the study. Patients with incompletely formed roots, absence of adjacent second molar were excluded. The data collected were analyzed by applying descriptive statistics. Results: The most common type of impaction was mesioangular (n=135, 45%) followed by vertical (n=100, 33.3%) and horizontal impaction (n=34, 11.3%).The majority of the cases were class II A (n=98, 32.6%), class I A (n=72, 24%), while there were minimal cases in class III B and III C. Conclusion: Recurrent pericoronitis was the most frequently reported reason for surgical removal of mandibular third molars. The postoperative infection rate was 3.6%, though the patient had undertaken antibiotics postoperatively. The use of corticosteroids can decrease the severity of postoperative sequelae in many patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: To study the prevalence, pattern and postoperative complications of impacted third molars based on Pell and Gregory and Winter's classification. Methods: This retrospective study was undertaken on 300 patients in the Thoothukudi Government medical college hospital in the department of dental surgery. Patients diagnosed with impacted mandibular third molars and treated surgically under local anesthesia were included in the study. Patients with incompletely formed roots, absence of adjacent second molar were excluded. The data collected were analyzed by applying descriptive statistics. Results: The most common type of impaction was mesioangular (n=135, 45%) followed by vertical (n=100, 33.3%) and horizontal impaction (n=34, 11.3%).The majority of the cases were class II A (n=98, 32.6%), class I A (n=72, 24%), while there were minimal cases in class III B and III C. Conclusion: Recurrent pericoronitis was the most frequently reported reason for surgical removal of mandibular third molars. The postoperative infection rate was 3.6%, though the patient had undertaken antibiotics postoperatively. The use of corticosteroids can decrease the severity of postoperative sequelae in many patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: To study the prevalence, pattern and postoperative complications of impacted third molars based on Pell and Gregory and Winter's classification. Methods: This retrospective study was undertaken on 300 patients in the Thoothukudi Government medical college hospital in the department of dental surgery. Patients diagnosed with impacted mandibular third molars and treated surgically under local anesthesia were included in the study. Patients with incompletely formed roots, absence of adjacent second molar were excluded. The data collected were analyzed by applying descriptive statistics. Results: The most common type of impaction was mesioangular (n=135, 45%) followed by vertical (n=100, 33.3%) and horizontal impaction (n=34, 11.3%).The majority of the cases were class II A (n=98, 32.6%), class I A (n=72, 24%), while there were minimal cases in class III B and III C. Conclusion: Recurrent pericoronitis was the most frequently reported reason for surgical removal of mandibular third molars. The postoperative infection rate was 3.6%, though the patient had undertaken antibiotics postoperatively. The use of corticosteroids can decrease the severity of postoperative sequelae in many patients.

Key concepts: Pericoronitis, Impaction, Medicine, Molar, Mandibular third molar, Dentistry, Impacted tooth, Retrospective cohort study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Study of prevalence and pattern of impacted mandibular third molar in a tertiary care centre — Research Paper | ScholarLens