Comments to “Yes, Stephen Hawking Lied To Us All About How Black Holes Decay”
Stephane Herman Maes
Abstract
Open-access reader
Stephane Herman Maes
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper discusses the comments presented in “Yes, Stephen Hawking Lied To Us All About How Black Holes Decay”. It shows that there are actually two contributions to, or two ways to characterize, Hawking radiations: the one from particles pairs created on the horizon of the black hole, with one particles falling behind the horizon, and the one from particle pairs created between the horizon and infinity, which have one particle reach infinity. We thought it is worth making sure all realize this.
OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper discusses the comments presented in “Yes, Stephen Hawking Lied To Us All About How Black Holes Decay”. It shows that there are actually two contributions to, or two ways to characterize, Hawking radiations: the one from particles pairs created on the horizon of the black hole, with one particles falling behind the horizon, and the one from particle pairs created between the horizon and infinity, which have one particle reach infinity. We thought it is worth making sure all realize this.
Key concepts: Hawking, Hawking radiation, Infinity, Horizon, Black hole (networking), Physics, Fuzzball, Micro black hole