2022Journal of the ASABERequires access

Evaluation of Bioaerosol Samplers for Airborne Escherichia Coli Carried by Poultry Litter Particles

Xuan Dung Nguyen, Yang Zhao, J.D. Evans, Jun Lin, Liesel G. Schneider, Brynn H. Voy, Shawn A. Hawkins, J.L. Purswell

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Highlights The study demonstrated a methodology to evaluate bioaerosol samplers on collecting Escherichia coli (E. coli) carried by airborne dust. A dry-base aerosolization system was developed for the study. The sampling efficiency of Andersen six-stage impactor and AGI-30 outperformed that of ACD-200 Bobcat. Airborne E. coli might be preferentially aggregated on large particles (> 7.0 µm). Abstract. Pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) are frequently recovered in poultry litter and may be transmitted through the air after bird activities create airborne dust. To assess risks of airborne transmission of E. coli carried by dust, efficient bioaerosol samplers under dry aerosolization conditions are required. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of three commonly used bioaerosol samplers, which included an Andersen six-stage impactor, an all-glass impinger (AGI-30), and an ACD-200 Bobcat (Bobcat), for collecting the airborne E. coli carried by dust particles under dry aerosolization condition in a bio-safety chamber. A dry aerosolization system was designed to generate dry bioaerosols for the study. Under the same airborne E. coli concentration with stable environmental conditions including temperature and relative humidity (RH), the E. coli concentrations determined by the three samplers were 5.05±2.08 log10 colony-forming units (CFU) m-3, 5.69±1.92 log10 CFU m-3, and 2.69±0.81 log10 CFU m-3 for Andersen six-stage impactor, AGI-30, and Bobcat, respectively. The results showed that there is no significant difference between Andersen six-stage impactor and AGI-30, while there was a sizeable decrease in the bacteria concentration determined by the Bobcat sampler. The results also showed that airborne E. coli were preferentially aggregated on large particles (> 7.0 µm). This study demonstrated a methodology to evaluate bioaerosol sampler efficiency using dry-base carriers of biological agents which are predominant in poultry houses. The optimal sampler can be used to determine the airborne E. coli loading in commercial poultry houses. Keywords: Airborne transmission, Bioaerosol samplers, Dry aerosolization, E. coli, Poultry.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Highlights The study demonstrated a methodology to evaluate bioaerosol samplers on collecting Escherichia coli (E. coli) carried by airborne dust. A dry-base aerosolization system was developed for the study. The sampling efficiency of Andersen six-stage impactor and AGI-30 outperformed that of ACD-200 Bobcat. Airborne E. coli might be preferentially aggregated on large particles (> 7.0 µm). Abstract. Pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) are frequently recovered in poultry litter and may be transmitted through the air after bird activities create airborne dust. To assess risks of airborne transmission of E. coli carried by dust, efficient bioaerosol samplers under dry aerosolization conditions are required. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of three commonly used bioaerosol samplers, which included an Andersen six-stage impactor, an all-glass impinger (AGI-30), and an ACD-200 Bobcat (Bobcat), for collecting the airborne E. coli carried by dust particles under dry aerosolization condition in a bio-safety chamber. A dry aerosolization system was designed to generate dry bioaerosols for the study. Under the same airborne E. coli concentration with stable environmental conditions including temperature and relative humidity (RH), the E. coli concentrations determined by the three samplers were 5.05±2.08 log10 colony-forming units (CFU) m-3, 5.69±1.92 log10 CFU m-3, and 2.69±0.81 log10 CFU m-3 for Andersen six-stage impactor, AGI-30, and Bobcat, respectively. The results showed that there is no significant difference between Andersen six-stage impactor and AGI-30, while there was a sizeable decrease in the bacteria concentration determined by the Bobcat sampler. The results also showed that airborne E. coli were preferentially aggregated on large particles (> 7.0 µm). This study demonstrated a methodology to evaluate bioaerosol sampler efficiency using dry-base carriers of biological agents which are predominant in poultry houses. The optimal sampler can be used to determine the airborne E. coli loading in commercial poultry houses. Keywords: Airborne transmission, Bioaerosol samplers, Dry aerosolization, E. coli, Poultry.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Highlights The study demonstrated a methodology to evaluate bioaerosol samplers on collecting Escherichia coli (E. coli) carried by airborne dust. A dry-base aerosolization system was developed for the study. The sampling efficiency of Andersen six-stage impactor and AGI-30 outperformed that of ACD-200 Bobcat. Airborne E. coli might be preferentially aggregated on large particles (> 7.0 µm). Abstract. Pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) are frequently recovered in poultry litter and may be transmitted through the air after bird activities create airborne dust. To assess risks of airborne transmission of E. coli carried by dust, efficient bioaerosol samplers under dry aerosolization conditions are required. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of three commonly used bioaerosol samplers, which included an Andersen six-stage impactor, an all-glass impinger (AGI-30), and an ACD-200 Bobcat (Bobcat), for collecting the airborne E. coli carried by dust particles under dry aerosolization condition in a bio-safety chamber. A dry aerosolization system was designed to generate dry bioaerosols for the study. Under the same airborne E. coli concentration with stable environmental conditions including temperature and relative humidity (RH), the E. coli concentrations determined by the three samplers were 5.05±2.08 log10 colony-forming units (CFU) m-3, 5.69±1.92 log10 CFU m-3, and 2.69±0.81 log10 CFU m-3 for Andersen six-stage impactor, AGI-30, and Bobcat, respectively. The results showed that there is no significant difference between Andersen six-stage impactor and AGI-30, while there was a sizeable decrease in the bacteria concentration determined by the Bobcat sampler. The results also showed that airborne E. coli were preferentially aggregated on large particles (> 7.0 µm). This study demonstrated a methodology to evaluate bioaerosol sampler efficiency using dry-base carriers of biological agents which are predominant in poultry houses. The optimal sampler can be used to determine the airborne E. coli loading in commercial poultry houses. Keywords: Airborne transmission, Bioaerosol samplers, Dry aerosolization, E. coli, Poultry.

Key concepts: Aerosolization, Bioaerosol, Indoor bioaerosol, Litter, Aerosol, Escherichia coli, Environmental science, Environmental chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Bioaerosol Samplers for Airborne Escherichia Coli Carried by Poultry Litter Particles — Research Paper | ScholarLens