Variation of Relative Humidity as Seen through Linking Water Vapor to Air Temperature: An Assessment of Interannual Variations in the Near-Surface Atmosphere
Jiawei Hao, Er Lu
Abstract
Open-access reader
Jiawei Hao, Er Lu
Abstract
Open-access reader
It has generally been regarded that, in the warming climate, atmospheric water vapor may increase due to the enhancement in surface evaporation, which is expected from the Clausius–Clapeyron (C–C) equation, along with the assumption that relative humidity experiences small changes. If the variation in relative humidity is small, the response of water vapor to temperature will be closely in line with the C–C equation. However, whether relative humidity experiences large or small changes needs be assessed, and the change of relative humidity should be compared with the change in surface–air temperature. In this study, we link surface vapor pressure, which characterizes atmospheric water vapor, to surface-air temperature, and treat both the temperature and relative humidity as influencing factors. A method based on linear regression is applied to compare the interannual variabilities of relative humidity and temperature in the interannual variation in surface vapor pressure. Whether the year-to-year perturbation of relative humidity is important, compared with the perturbation in surface-air temperature, is explored Results show that, at high latitudes of both hemispheres, the variation in vapor pressure is dominated by air temperature, and relative humidity has small positive contributions. Thus, the variation in relative humidity over these regions is comparably small, and the response of water vapor to temperature can well follow the C–C equation. Differently, at mid-low latitudes, especially on land, air temperature plays a negative role in the variation in vapor pressure. Relative humidity offsets the negative contribution and dominates the variation in vapor pressure, suggesting that the variation in the relative humidity over these regions is comparably large. Hence, the response of water vapor to temperature deviate from the C–C equation. Analysis indicates that the different results of the dominance from the two influencing factors are affected by the dual effects of precipitation or wet-air transport over land. Both precipitation and the transport of cold wet air could break the C–C relation between water vapor pressure and temperature.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It has generally been regarded that, in the warming climate, atmospheric water vapor may increase due to the enhancement in surface evaporation, which is expected from the Clausius–Clapeyron (C–C) equation, along with the assumption that relative humidity experiences small changes. If the variation in relative humidity is small, the response of water vapor to temperature will be closely in line with the C–C equation. However, whether relative humidity experiences large or small changes needs be assessed, and the change of relative humidity should be compared with the change in surface–air temperature. In this study, we link surface vapor pressure, which characterizes atmospheric water vapor, to surface-air temperature, and treat both the temperature and relative humidity as influencing factors. A method based on linear regression is applied to compare the interannual variabilities of relative humidity and temperature in the interannual variation in surface vapor pressure. Whether the year-to-year perturbation of relative humidity is important, compared with the perturbation in surface-air temperature, is explored Results show that, at high latitudes of both hemispheres, the variation in vapor pressure is dominated by air temperature, and relative humidity has small positive contributions. Thus, the variation in relative humidity over these regions is comparably small, and the response of water vapor to temperature can well follow the C–C equation. Differently, at mid-low latitudes, especially on land, air temperature plays a negative role in the variation in vapor pressure. Relative humidity offsets the negative contribution and dominates the variation in vapor pressure, suggesting that the variation in the relative humidity over these regions is comparably large. Hence, the response of water vapor to temperature deviate from the C–C equation. Analysis indicates that the different results of the dominance from the two influencing factors are affected by the dual effects of precipitation or wet-air transport over land. Both precipitation and the transport of cold wet air could break the C–C relation between water vapor pressure and temperature.
Key concepts: Relative humidity, Water vapor, Humidity, Atmospheric sciences, Apparent temperature, Vapor pressure, Vapour pressure of water, Environmental science