2022•Research SquareOpen access

Hepatic Failure Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Real-world Study from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database

Ye Xu, Cilin Yan, Ying Zhao, Dandan Li, Mingxing Guo, Xiangli Cui

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Although Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) associated liver damage usually presented as mild elevations of liver enzymes, hepatic failure induced by ICIs have been reported in only a few case series and case reports. Objective We aimed to explore the association between ICIs and hepatic failure, and characterize the clinical features of ICI-associated hepatic failure in the real-world database. Methods Data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2015 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2021 in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were retrieved for disproportionality and bayesian analysis. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and information component (IC) were used to evaluate correlations between ICIs and hepatic failure. Results A total of 654 reports of ICI-associated hepatic failure were identified. The overall median time from ICIs initiation to hepatic failure onset was 38 days, and 72.3% of the adverse events occurred within the first 3 months. Death cases accounted for 68.65%. Generally, a strong signal was shown between ICIs and hepatic failure (ROR025 = 2.70, IC025 = 1.39). For three categories of ICIs, anti-PD-1s (ROR025 = 2.54, IC025 = 1.32) had a higher risk signal than anti-PD-L1s and anti-CTLA-4s. For monotherapy, atezolizumab showed the strongest risk signal (ROR025 = 4.07, IC025 = 1.90). The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab showed stronger signals of hepatic failure compared with nivolumab or ipilimumab alone(nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. ipilimumab: ROR025 = 1.40, IC025 = 0.16; nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. nivolumab: ROR025 = 1.24, IC025 = 0.34). Considering the concomitant used agents with ICIs, the majority of these regimens showed stronger signals than ICI monotherapy, such as acetaminophen (ICIs + acetaminophen vs. ICIs: ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.32). Conclusion ICIs had possible strong signals associated with hepatic failure, and most cases of hepatic failure occurred within the first three months and had poor outcomes, which should attract clinical attention.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Background Although Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) associated liver damage usually presented as mild elevations of liver enzymes, hepatic failure induced by ICIs have been reported in only a few case series and case reports. Objective We aimed to explore the association between ICIs and hepatic failure, and characterize the clinical features of ICI-associated hepatic failure in the real-world database. Methods Data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2015 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2021 in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were retrieved for disproportionality and bayesian analysis. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and information component (IC) were used to evaluate correlations between ICIs and hepatic failure. Results A total of 654 reports of ICI-associated hepatic failure were identified. The overall median time from ICIs initiation to hepatic failure onset was 38 days, and 72.3% of the adverse events occurred within the first 3 months. Death cases accounted for 68.65%. Generally, a strong signal was shown between ICIs and hepatic failure (ROR025 = 2.70, IC025 = 1.39). For three categories of ICIs, anti-PD-1s (ROR025 = 2.54, IC025 = 1.32) had a higher risk signal than anti-PD-L1s and anti-CTLA-4s. For monotherapy, atezolizumab showed the strongest risk signal (ROR025 = 4.07, IC025 = 1.90). The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab showed stronger signals of hepatic failure compared with nivolumab or ipilimumab alone(nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. ipilimumab: ROR025 = 1.40, IC025 = 0.16; nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. nivolumab: ROR025 = 1.24, IC025 = 0.34). Considering the concomitant used agents with ICIs, the majority of these regimens showed stronger signals than ICI monotherapy, such as acetaminophen (ICIs + acetaminophen vs. ICIs: ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.32). Conclusion ICIs had possible strong signals associated with hepatic failure, and most cases of hepatic failure occurred within the first three months and had poor outcomes, which should attract clinical attention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Background Although Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) associated liver damage usually presented as mild elevations of liver enzymes, hepatic failure induced by ICIs have been reported in only a few case series and case reports. Objective We aimed to explore the association between ICIs and hepatic failure, and characterize the clinical features of ICI-associated hepatic failure in the real-world database. Methods Data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2015 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2021 in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were retrieved for disproportionality and bayesian analysis. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) and information component (IC) were used to evaluate correlations between ICIs and hepatic failure. Results A total of 654 reports of ICI-associated hepatic failure were identified. The overall median time from ICIs initiation to hepatic failure onset was 38 days, and 72.3% of the adverse events occurred within the first 3 months. Death cases accounted for 68.65%. Generally, a strong signal was shown between ICIs and hepatic failure (ROR025 = 2.70, IC025 = 1.39). For three categories of ICIs, anti-PD-1s (ROR025 = 2.54, IC025 = 1.32) had a higher risk signal than anti-PD-L1s and anti-CTLA-4s. For monotherapy, atezolizumab showed the strongest risk signal (ROR025 = 4.07, IC025 = 1.90). The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab showed stronger signals of hepatic failure compared with nivolumab or ipilimumab alone(nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. ipilimumab: ROR025 = 1.40, IC025 = 0.16; nivolumab + ipilimumab vs. nivolumab: ROR025 = 1.24, IC025 = 0.34). Considering the concomitant used agents with ICIs, the majority of these regimens showed stronger signals than ICI monotherapy, such as acetaminophen (ICIs + acetaminophen vs. ICIs: ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.32). Conclusion ICIs had possible strong signals associated with hepatic failure, and most cases of hepatic failure occurred within the first three months and had poor outcomes, which should attract clinical attention.

Key concepts: Adverse Event Reporting System, Food and drug administration, Adverse effect, Database, Event (particle physics), Medicine, Business, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hepatic Failure Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Real-world Study from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database — Research Paper | ScholarLens