2022Urban Water JournalRequires access

‘How would an extreme flood have behaved if flood protection works were built?’ the case of the disastrous flash flood of November 2017 in Mandra, Attica, Greece

Georgios Mitsopoulos, Michalis Diakakis, Elpida Panagiotatou, Vasiliki Sant, A. A. Bloutsos, E. Lekkas, Evangelos Baltas, Anastasios I. Stamou

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

The flash flood in the town of Mandra, Attica, in 2017 that had a return period equal to approximately T = 150 years was one of the most disastrous floods in Greece. Four years later, flood protection works designed for T = 50 years were built. In this work, we pose the research question ‘How would this disastrous flood have behaved if flood protection works were built?’ To answer this question, we employed the HEC-RAS 1D/2D model, over a detailed DSM, that we calibrated with field measurements to simulate the flood of 2017. We derived the following conclusions: (1) Flooding of the main streets still occurs with 15–25% lower flow velocities and 19–29% lower water depths. (2) The total extent of the inundation areas is reduced by 17%. (3) Works delay flood arrival by approximately 1.5 hour, thus providing the opportunity for an Early Warning System to respond more effectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The flash flood in the town of Mandra, Attica, in 2017 that had a return period equal to approximately T = 150 years was one of the most disastrous floods in Greece. Four years later, flood protection works designed for T = 50 years were built. In this work, we pose the research question ‘How would this disastrous flood have behaved if flood protection works were built?’ To answer this question, we employed the HEC-RAS 1D/2D model, over a detailed DSM, that we calibrated with field measurements to simulate the flood of 2017. We derived the following conclusions: (1) Flooding of the main streets still occurs with 15–25% lower flow velocities and 19–29% lower water depths. (2) The total extent of the inundation areas is reduced by 17%. (3) Works delay flood arrival by approximately 1.5 hour, thus providing the opportunity for an Early Warning System to respond more effectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The flash flood in the town of Mandra, Attica, in 2017 that had a return period equal to approximately T = 150 years was one of the most disastrous floods in Greece. Four years later, flood protection works designed for T = 50 years were built. In this work, we pose the research question ‘How would this disastrous flood have behaved if flood protection works were built?’ To answer this question, we employed the HEC-RAS 1D/2D model, over a detailed DSM, that we calibrated with field measurements to simulate the flood of 2017. We derived the following conclusions: (1) Flooding of the main streets still occurs with 15–25% lower flow velocities and 19–29% lower water depths. (2) The total extent of the inundation areas is reduced by 17%. (3) Works delay flood arrival by approximately 1.5 hour, thus providing the opportunity for an Early Warning System to respond more effectively.

Key concepts: Flash flood, Flood myth, Flooding (psychology), Hydrology (agriculture), 100-year flood, Return period, Environmental science, Flood warning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
‘How would an extreme flood have behaved if flood protection works were built?’ the case of the disastrous flash flood of November 2017 in Mandra, Attica, Greece — Research Paper | ScholarLens