2022Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesRequires access

Net Primary Production and Ecosystem Carbon Flux of Brazilian Tropical Savanna Ecosystems From Eddy Covariance and Inventory Methods

George L. Vourlitis, Osvaldo Borges Pinto, Higo J. Dalmagro, Paulo Henrique Zanella de Arruda, Francisco de Almeida Lobo, José de Souza Nogueira

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Abstract Estimates of net primary (NPP) and ecosystem production (NEP) are needed for tropical savanna, which is structurally diverse but understudied compared to tropical rainforest. We used eddy covariance and inventory methods to estimate carbon (C) fluxes for an upland mixed grassland and a seasonally flooded forest to determine the correspondence between these methods and assess the contribution of C cycling components to the total NPP. Both techniques provided similar estimates of net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (−3.0 ‒ 2.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. −2.0 ‒ 4.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory), gross primary production (7.5–16.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. 8.7–18.4 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory), and total NPP (0.9–7.5 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. 2.0–9.5 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory). Belowground NPP accounted for 49%–53% of the total NPP for both ecosystems, followed by aboveground litter (26%–27%) and wood (16%–17%) production. Increases in water availability increased the potential for C storage, but the mechanism was different in the savanna types. Compared to other savanna ecosystems, the mixed grassland had a lower productivity and C use efficiency (CUE = NPP/GPP = 0.28), while the Cerrado forest had a high CUE (0.58) and similar C flux rates to other tropical savanna forests. The agreement in the C cycle estimates derived from the eddy covariance and inventory methods increases our confidence in the productivity estimates for these tropical savanna ecosystems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Estimates of net primary (NPP) and ecosystem production (NEP) are needed for tropical savanna, which is structurally diverse but understudied compared to tropical rainforest. We used eddy covariance and inventory methods to estimate carbon (C) fluxes for an upland mixed grassland and a seasonally flooded forest to determine the correspondence between these methods and assess the contribution of C cycling components to the total NPP. Both techniques provided similar estimates of net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (−3.0 ‒ 2.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. −2.0 ‒ 4.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory), gross primary production (7.5–16.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. 8.7–18.4 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory), and total NPP (0.9–7.5 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. 2.0–9.5 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory). Belowground NPP accounted for 49%–53% of the total NPP for both ecosystems, followed by aboveground litter (26%–27%) and wood (16%–17%) production. Increases in water availability increased the potential for C storage, but the mechanism was different in the savanna types. Compared to other savanna ecosystems, the mixed grassland had a lower productivity and C use efficiency (CUE = NPP/GPP = 0.28), while the Cerrado forest had a high CUE (0.58) and similar C flux rates to other tropical savanna forests. The agreement in the C cycle estimates derived from the eddy covariance and inventory methods increases our confidence in the productivity estimates for these tropical savanna ecosystems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Estimates of net primary (NPP) and ecosystem production (NEP) are needed for tropical savanna, which is structurally diverse but understudied compared to tropical rainforest. We used eddy covariance and inventory methods to estimate carbon (C) fluxes for an upland mixed grassland and a seasonally flooded forest to determine the correspondence between these methods and assess the contribution of C cycling components to the total NPP. Both techniques provided similar estimates of net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (−3.0 ‒ 2.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. −2.0 ‒ 4.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory), gross primary production (7.5–16.3 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. 8.7–18.4 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory), and total NPP (0.9–7.5 MgC ha −1 y −1 for eddy covariance vs. 2.0–9.5 MgC ha −1 y −1 for inventory). Belowground NPP accounted for 49%–53% of the total NPP for both ecosystems, followed by aboveground litter (26%–27%) and wood (16%–17%) production. Increases in water availability increased the potential for C storage, but the mechanism was different in the savanna types. Compared to other savanna ecosystems, the mixed grassland had a lower productivity and C use efficiency (CUE = NPP/GPP = 0.28), while the Cerrado forest had a high CUE (0.58) and similar C flux rates to other tropical savanna forests. The agreement in the C cycle estimates derived from the eddy covariance and inventory methods increases our confidence in the productivity estimates for these tropical savanna ecosystems.

Key concepts: Eddy covariance, Primary production, Environmental science, Ecosystem, Carbon cycle, Flux (metallurgy), Atmospheric sciences, Grassland

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Net Primary Production and Ecosystem Carbon Flux of Brazilian Tropical Savanna Ecosystems From Eddy Covariance and Inventory Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens