2021•Princeton University Press eBooksRequires access

The Paths and Democratic Survival

Michael K. Miller

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter explores how the paths affect democratic survival and quality, building on past work that connects transitions to the ensuing democracy to develop expectations for the paths. It tests the distinct transition types on a full sample of democracies from 1800 to 2014, predicting survival and four measures of quality. The findings are clear: democracies are significantly more durable and of higher quality when transitions follow regimes with established ruling parties compared with domestic shocks. The chapter emphasizes how international shocks and other transitions are more mixed, causing the paths to carry legacies for democracy with implications for how democracy can best continue to spread. Electoral continuity stands out as the most favorable route to democracy, although it comes at a cost of greater institutional persistence from autocracy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explores how the paths affect democratic survival and quality, building on past work that connects transitions to the ensuing democracy to develop expectations for the paths. It tests the distinct transition types on a full sample of democracies from 1800 to 2014, predicting survival and four measures of quality. The findings are clear: democracies are significantly more durable and of higher quality when transitions follow regimes with established ruling parties compared with domestic shocks. The chapter emphasizes how international shocks and other transitions are more mixed, causing the paths to carry legacies for democracy with implications for how democracy can best continue to spread. Electoral continuity stands out as the most favorable route to democracy, although it comes at a cost of greater institutional persistence from autocracy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explores how the paths affect democratic survival and quality, building on past work that connects transitions to the ensuing democracy to develop expectations for the paths. It tests the distinct transition types on a full sample of democracies from 1800 to 2014, predicting survival and four measures of quality. The findings are clear: democracies are significantly more durable and of higher quality when transitions follow regimes with established ruling parties compared with domestic shocks. The chapter emphasizes how international shocks and other transitions are more mixed, causing the paths to carry legacies for democracy with implications for how democracy can best continue to spread. Electoral continuity stands out as the most favorable route to democracy, although it comes at a cost of greater institutional persistence from autocracy.

Key concepts: Autocracy, Democracy, Quality (philosophy), Sample (material), Political economy, Work (physics), Political science, Transition (genetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Paths and Democratic Survival — Research Paper | ScholarLens