2022Fertility Science and ResearchRequires access

Sperm DNA fragmentation − can it be a routine?

Sasikala Natarajamani

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Aim: To assess the correlation between semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and to examine whether SDF can be recommended as a routine test along with semen analysis. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted for 118 male infertile patients attending a fertility clinic obtained from the records between 2017 and 2019. Semen analysis and SDF were assessed according to World Health Organization − 2010 guidelines and sperm chromatin dispersion test, respectively. Patients were grouped based on their SDF scores as “low DNA fragmentation group (LDF)” if SDF ≤ 18% and as “high DNA fragmentation group (HDF)” if SDF > 18%. Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to find the difference in the mean of semen parameters between SDF groups. Statistical analysis was carried out using STATA Version-14. Results: The mean value of sperm concentration, motility, and normal morphology was higher in LDF compared to HDF. Correlation analysis showed patients’ age to be positively associated with SDF (r = 0.125; P = 0.102). Sperm concentration, progressive motility, and normal morphology had a weak negative correlation with SDF. Around 63% and 69% of patients with normal morphology and normal motility respectively had high SDF. In the HDF category, nearly 42% had normal morphology, whereas a 66% demonstrated normal motility. The results of Kruskal–Wallis test for patients who had a treatment outcome (conception) showed that patients in LDF group had 1.5 times higher chance of “conception and live birth.” Conclusion: Men with normal semen parameters can still have a high level of SDF. SDF along with semen analysis can help assess the reproductive potential of a male better.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: To assess the correlation between semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and to examine whether SDF can be recommended as a routine test along with semen analysis. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted for 118 male infertile patients attending a fertility clinic obtained from the records between 2017 and 2019. Semen analysis and SDF were assessed according to World Health Organization − 2010 guidelines and sperm chromatin dispersion test, respectively. Patients were grouped based on their SDF scores as “low DNA fragmentation group (LDF)” if SDF ≤ 18% and as “high DNA fragmentation group (HDF)” if SDF > 18%. Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to find the difference in the mean of semen parameters between SDF groups. Statistical analysis was carried out using STATA Version-14. Results: The mean value of sperm concentration, motility, and normal morphology was higher in LDF compared to HDF. Correlation analysis showed patients’ age to be positively associated with SDF (r = 0.125; P = 0.102). Sperm concentration, progressive motility, and normal morphology had a weak negative correlation with SDF. Around 63% and 69% of patients with normal morphology and normal motility respectively had high SDF. In the HDF category, nearly 42% had normal morphology, whereas a 66% demonstrated normal motility. The results of Kruskal–Wallis test for patients who had a treatment outcome (conception) showed that patients in LDF group had 1.5 times higher chance of “conception and live birth.” Conclusion: Men with normal semen parameters can still have a high level of SDF. SDF along with semen analysis can help assess the reproductive potential of a male better.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: To assess the correlation between semen parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and to examine whether SDF can be recommended as a routine test along with semen analysis. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted for 118 male infertile patients attending a fertility clinic obtained from the records between 2017 and 2019. Semen analysis and SDF were assessed according to World Health Organization − 2010 guidelines and sperm chromatin dispersion test, respectively. Patients were grouped based on their SDF scores as “low DNA fragmentation group (LDF)” if SDF ≤ 18% and as “high DNA fragmentation group (HDF)” if SDF > 18%. Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to find the difference in the mean of semen parameters between SDF groups. Statistical analysis was carried out using STATA Version-14. Results: The mean value of sperm concentration, motility, and normal morphology was higher in LDF compared to HDF. Correlation analysis showed patients’ age to be positively associated with SDF (r = 0.125; P = 0.102). Sperm concentration, progressive motility, and normal morphology had a weak negative correlation with SDF. Around 63% and 69% of patients with normal morphology and normal motility respectively had high SDF. In the HDF category, nearly 42% had normal morphology, whereas a 66% demonstrated normal motility. The results of Kruskal–Wallis test for patients who had a treatment outcome (conception) showed that patients in LDF group had 1.5 times higher chance of “conception and live birth.” Conclusion: Men with normal semen parameters can still have a high level of SDF. SDF along with semen analysis can help assess the reproductive potential of a male better.

Key concepts: DNA fragmentation, Semen analysis, Semen, Sperm, Andrology, Mann–Whitney U test, Correlation, Sperm motility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sperm DNA fragmentation − can it be a routine? — Research Paper | ScholarLens