2022Frontiers in Food Science and TechnologyOpen access

Preparation of Functional Pasta Supplemented with Amaranth Pregelatinized Extruded Flour

Luís A. Bello‐Pérez, Jesus A. Cabello-Vazquez, Roselis Carmona‐García, Omar Patiño-Rodríguez, José Álvarez‐Ramírez

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

Semolina pasta with improved nutritional properties is increasingly demanded by consumers. High protein content and low starch digestibility are features desired for a functional pasta. In this work, amaranth flour was used for 50% supplementation of semolina in pasta preparation. Raw amaranth flour increased protein from 11.7 g/100 g to about 14.0 g/100, dietary fiber from 6.8 g/100 g to about 8.0–10.0 g/100 g. However, raw amaranth flour deteriorated the texture of cooked pasta by increasing hardness from 15.7 to 52.8 N and reducing cohesiveness from 0.71 to 0.55. Pregelatinizations at 50 and 100% were explored to reduce the adverse effects of raw amaranth flour. The gelatinized amaranth flour mimicked the texture of semolina pasta, although cooking loss increased from 3.3 g/100 g to about 9.2 g/100 g, and the water absorption showed a marked reduction from 116.4% to about 80.0–84.0%. The in vitro starch digestibility was similar for pasta made with semolina and pasta containing pregelatinized starch, although digestibility decreased from 95 to 85% for raw amaranth flour. Overall, the results showed that amaranth flour offered advantages and drawbacks for the formulation of pasta with improved nutritional features.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Semolina pasta with improved nutritional properties is increasingly demanded by consumers. High protein content and low starch digestibility are features desired for a functional pasta. In this work, amaranth flour was used for 50% supplementation of semolina in pasta preparation. Raw amaranth flour increased protein from 11.7 g/100 g to about 14.0 g/100, dietary fiber from 6.8 g/100 g to about 8.0–10.0 g/100 g. However, raw amaranth flour deteriorated the texture of cooked pasta by increasing hardness from 15.7 to 52.8 N and reducing cohesiveness from 0.71 to 0.55. Pregelatinizations at 50 and 100% were explored to reduce the adverse effects of raw amaranth flour. The gelatinized amaranth flour mimicked the texture of semolina pasta, although cooking loss increased from 3.3 g/100 g to about 9.2 g/100 g, and the water absorption showed a marked reduction from 116.4% to about 80.0–84.0%. The in vitro starch digestibility was similar for pasta made with semolina and pasta containing pregelatinized starch, although digestibility decreased from 95 to 85% for raw amaranth flour. Overall, the results showed that amaranth flour offered advantages and drawbacks for the formulation of pasta with improved nutritional features.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Semolina pasta with improved nutritional properties is increasingly demanded by consumers. High protein content and low starch digestibility are features desired for a functional pasta. In this work, amaranth flour was used for 50% supplementation of semolina in pasta preparation. Raw amaranth flour increased protein from 11.7 g/100 g to about 14.0 g/100, dietary fiber from 6.8 g/100 g to about 8.0–10.0 g/100 g. However, raw amaranth flour deteriorated the texture of cooked pasta by increasing hardness from 15.7 to 52.8 N and reducing cohesiveness from 0.71 to 0.55. Pregelatinizations at 50 and 100% were explored to reduce the adverse effects of raw amaranth flour. The gelatinized amaranth flour mimicked the texture of semolina pasta, although cooking loss increased from 3.3 g/100 g to about 9.2 g/100 g, and the water absorption showed a marked reduction from 116.4% to about 80.0–84.0%. The in vitro starch digestibility was similar for pasta made with semolina and pasta containing pregelatinized starch, although digestibility decreased from 95 to 85% for raw amaranth flour. Overall, the results showed that amaranth flour offered advantages and drawbacks for the formulation of pasta with improved nutritional features.

Key concepts: Amaranth, Food science, Starch, Wheat flour, Raw material, Chemistry, Absorption of water, Botany

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preparation of Functional Pasta Supplemented with Amaranth Pregelatinized Extruded Flour — Research Paper | ScholarLens