2022Encyclopedia of Religious EthicsRequires access

Deontology

Bharat Ranganathan

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In contemporary normative ethics, deontology is a theory according to which agents deliberate about how they ought to act and evaluate whether their actions are right or wrong. On a rough characterization, deontology prioritizes the right over the good. Therefore, deontological normative theories require, forbid, or permit actions as a matter of principles, largely regardless of the outcomes produced by those actions. In contemporary normative ethics, the foil for deontology is consequentialism, with the latter prescribing and evaluating the rightness or wrongness of an action solely according to the consequences brought about by that action. This entry identifies some of the characteristics of deontological moral reasoning, including its contractualist variety. To better appreciate these characteristics, the entry works through some thought experiments, aiming to highlight the distinctions between deontology and consequentialism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In contemporary normative ethics, deontology is a theory according to which agents deliberate about how they ought to act and evaluate whether their actions are right or wrong. On a rough characterization, deontology prioritizes the right over the good. Therefore, deontological normative theories require, forbid, or permit actions as a matter of principles, largely regardless of the outcomes produced by those actions. In contemporary normative ethics, the foil for deontology is consequentialism, with the latter prescribing and evaluating the rightness or wrongness of an action solely according to the consequences brought about by that action. This entry identifies some of the characteristics of deontological moral reasoning, including its contractualist variety. To better appreciate these characteristics, the entry works through some thought experiments, aiming to highlight the distinctions between deontology and consequentialism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In contemporary normative ethics, deontology is a theory according to which agents deliberate about how they ought to act and evaluate whether their actions are right or wrong. On a rough characterization, deontology prioritizes the right over the good. Therefore, deontological normative theories require, forbid, or permit actions as a matter of principles, largely regardless of the outcomes produced by those actions. In contemporary normative ethics, the foil for deontology is consequentialism, with the latter prescribing and evaluating the rightness or wrongness of an action solely according to the consequences brought about by that action. This entry identifies some of the characteristics of deontological moral reasoning, including its contractualist variety. To better appreciate these characteristics, the entry works through some thought experiments, aiming to highlight the distinctions between deontology and consequentialism.

Key concepts: Deontological ethics, Consequentialism, Normative, Action (physics), Epistemology, Normative ethics, Ethical theory, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Deontology — Research Paper | ScholarLens