2022The Korean Data Analysis SocietyRequires access

Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effect on the Treated: Application of Anti-Graft Act

The Korean Data Analysis Society, Hosin Song

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this study, Abadie(2005)’s semiparametric difference-in-difference(DID) and propensity score matching DID methods are implemented to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated(ATET) of the Anti-Graft Act on the expenditure on congratulations and condolences(ECC). Both approaches are semiparametric since they do not require a specific functional form specification of the outcome variable. By following Abadie(2005), the ATET can be estimated by using observed outcomes at before and after policy intervention, treatment indicator and propensity score of all observations. On the other hand, the propensity score matching DID is a very intuitive method to estimate ATET since it can find a counterfactual control for each treated unit. Abadie’s semiparametric DID estimate is -0.06 while the propensity score matching estimate is -0.12. However, the statistical significance is found only in the latter estimation result. It implies that the treatment group are expected to reduce the expenditure on congratulations and condolences by 12.8 percent less than the control group if the control group would be exposed to the treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, Abadie(2005)’s semiparametric difference-in-difference(DID) and propensity score matching DID methods are implemented to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated(ATET) of the Anti-Graft Act on the expenditure on congratulations and condolences(ECC). Both approaches are semiparametric since they do not require a specific functional form specification of the outcome variable. By following Abadie(2005), the ATET can be estimated by using observed outcomes at before and after policy intervention, treatment indicator and propensity score of all observations. On the other hand, the propensity score matching DID is a very intuitive method to estimate ATET since it can find a counterfactual control for each treated unit. Abadie’s semiparametric DID estimate is -0.06 while the propensity score matching estimate is -0.12. However, the statistical significance is found only in the latter estimation result. It implies that the treatment group are expected to reduce the expenditure on congratulations and condolences by 12.8 percent less than the control group if the control group would be exposed to the treatment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, Abadie(2005)’s semiparametric difference-in-difference(DID) and propensity score matching DID methods are implemented to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated(ATET) of the Anti-Graft Act on the expenditure on congratulations and condolences(ECC). Both approaches are semiparametric since they do not require a specific functional form specification of the outcome variable. By following Abadie(2005), the ATET can be estimated by using observed outcomes at before and after policy intervention, treatment indicator and propensity score of all observations. On the other hand, the propensity score matching DID is a very intuitive method to estimate ATET since it can find a counterfactual control for each treated unit. Abadie’s semiparametric DID estimate is -0.06 while the propensity score matching estimate is -0.12. However, the statistical significance is found only in the latter estimation result. It implies that the treatment group are expected to reduce the expenditure on congratulations and condolences by 12.8 percent less than the control group if the control group would be exposed to the treatment.

Key concepts: Propensity score matching, Average treatment effect, Matching (statistics), Counterfactual thinking, Estimation, Econometrics, Statistics, Treatment and control groups

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effect on the Treated: Application of Anti-Graft Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens