When poll is more energy efficient than interrupt

Polling is commonly indicated to be a more suitable IO completion mechanism than interrupt for ultra-low latency storage devices. However, polling's impact on overall energy efficiency has not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, contrary to common belief, we show that polling can also be more energy efficient than interrupt. To do so, we systematically investigate the energy efficiency of all available Linux IO completion mechanisms, including interrupt, classic polling, and hybrid polling using a real ultra-low latency storage device, a power meter, and various workload behaviors. Our experimental results indicate that although hybrid polling provides a good trade-off in CPU utilization, it is the least energy efficient, whereas classic polling is the most energy efficient for low latency IO requests. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper classifying polling as more energy efficient than interrupt for a real secondary storage device, and we hope that our observations will lead to more energy efficient IO completion mechanisms for new generation storage device characteristics.