2022•Unpublished venueRequires access

Human Sciences and Natural Sciences

Thierry Martin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There is a close relationship between the question of the unity of the sciences and that of the scientificity of the human and social sciences, because they both involve the question of the identification of scientific knowledge. There are three intertwined questions, which the development of science in contemporary times has renewed with the introduction of numerical methods, the generalization of the use of probabilities, and the emergence of new fields of knowledge. How do we think of the distinction, if it exists, between natural sciences and human sciences, and consequently how do we think of the question of the unity of the sciences? In this chapter, I will seek to show that the treatment of these questions requires a distinction between different levels of scientific generality, degrees of formalization, and forms of scientificity, which go beyond the alleged cleavage between natural sciences and human and social sciences.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is a close relationship between the question of the unity of the sciences and that of the scientificity of the human and social sciences, because they both involve the question of the identification of scientific knowledge. There are three intertwined questions, which the development of science in contemporary times has renewed with the introduction of numerical methods, the generalization of the use of probabilities, and the emergence of new fields of knowledge. How do we think of the distinction, if it exists, between natural sciences and human sciences, and consequently how do we think of the question of the unity of the sciences? In this chapter, I will seek to show that the treatment of these questions requires a distinction between different levels of scientific generality, degrees of formalization, and forms of scientificity, which go beyond the alleged cleavage between natural sciences and human and social sciences.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is a close relationship between the question of the unity of the sciences and that of the scientificity of the human and social sciences, because they both involve the question of the identification of scientific knowledge. There are three intertwined questions, which the development of science in contemporary times has renewed with the introduction of numerical methods, the generalization of the use of probabilities, and the emergence of new fields of knowledge. How do we think of the distinction, if it exists, between natural sciences and human sciences, and consequently how do we think of the question of the unity of the sciences? In this chapter, I will seek to show that the treatment of these questions requires a distinction between different levels of scientific generality, degrees of formalization, and forms of scientificity, which go beyond the alleged cleavage between natural sciences and human and social sciences.

Key concepts: Human science, Natural science, Generality, Epistemology, Natural (archaeology), Social science, Biological sciences, Generalization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Human Sciences and Natural Sciences — Research Paper | ScholarLens