2022Flavour and Fragrance JournalRequires access

Effect of lipid on formation of Maillard and lipid‐Maillard meaty flavour compounds in heated cysteine‐xylose‐methyl linoleate system

Yutong Wang, Jianchun Xie, Chenping Zhang, Yuxia Xu, Xuelian Yang

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

Abstract The effect of lipid level and reaction temperature and time on the heated cysteine‐xylose reaction to form meaty flavours was investigated. The presence of 1% or 2% methyl linoleate inhibited the formation of volatile sulfur‐containing compounds and heterocyclic compounds via the Maillard reaction, that is Maillard compounds. However, the former was better because of the moderate inhibition and more compounds generated from the lipid‐Maillard interaction, that is lipid‐Maillard compounds. Partial least squares‐discriminant analysis suggested the lipid‐Maillard compounds were the main markers during varying dosage of methyl linoleate, reaction temperature (100–140°C) and reaction time (30–180 min). Lower temperatures increased formation of the Maillard compounds (eg, 2‐furfurylthiol) or lipid‐Maillard compounds (eg, 2‐pentylpyridine) with reaction time. However, high temperatures caused their amounts changed in a curve or irregularly due to the complications from the Maillard and lipid oxidization reactions. By comparing time‐courses of the levels of cysteine and Cys‐Amadori compounds, and 294 and 420 nm UV absorbance values in the reaction systems under 120°C with or without 2% methyl linoleate, it was revealed that the underlying lipid effect mechanism was to initially inhibit and later attend the Maillard reaction, leading to less formation of the Maillard compounds and generation of the lipid‐Maillard compounds.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The effect of lipid level and reaction temperature and time on the heated cysteine‐xylose reaction to form meaty flavours was investigated. The presence of 1% or 2% methyl linoleate inhibited the formation of volatile sulfur‐containing compounds and heterocyclic compounds via the Maillard reaction, that is Maillard compounds. However, the former was better because of the moderate inhibition and more compounds generated from the lipid‐Maillard interaction, that is lipid‐Maillard compounds. Partial least squares‐discriminant analysis suggested the lipid‐Maillard compounds were the main markers during varying dosage of methyl linoleate, reaction temperature (100–140°C) and reaction time (30–180 min). Lower temperatures increased formation of the Maillard compounds (eg, 2‐furfurylthiol) or lipid‐Maillard compounds (eg, 2‐pentylpyridine) with reaction time. However, high temperatures caused their amounts changed in a curve or irregularly due to the complications from the Maillard and lipid oxidization reactions. By comparing time‐courses of the levels of cysteine and Cys‐Amadori compounds, and 294 and 420 nm UV absorbance values in the reaction systems under 120°C with or without 2% methyl linoleate, it was revealed that the underlying lipid effect mechanism was to initially inhibit and later attend the Maillard reaction, leading to less formation of the Maillard compounds and generation of the lipid‐Maillard compounds.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The effect of lipid level and reaction temperature and time on the heated cysteine‐xylose reaction to form meaty flavours was investigated. The presence of 1% or 2% methyl linoleate inhibited the formation of volatile sulfur‐containing compounds and heterocyclic compounds via the Maillard reaction, that is Maillard compounds. However, the former was better because of the moderate inhibition and more compounds generated from the lipid‐Maillard interaction, that is lipid‐Maillard compounds. Partial least squares‐discriminant analysis suggested the lipid‐Maillard compounds were the main markers during varying dosage of methyl linoleate, reaction temperature (100–140°C) and reaction time (30–180 min). Lower temperatures increased formation of the Maillard compounds (eg, 2‐furfurylthiol) or lipid‐Maillard compounds (eg, 2‐pentylpyridine) with reaction time. However, high temperatures caused their amounts changed in a curve or irregularly due to the complications from the Maillard and lipid oxidization reactions. By comparing time‐courses of the levels of cysteine and Cys‐Amadori compounds, and 294 and 420 nm UV absorbance values in the reaction systems under 120°C with or without 2% methyl linoleate, it was revealed that the underlying lipid effect mechanism was to initially inhibit and later attend the Maillard reaction, leading to less formation of the Maillard compounds and generation of the lipid‐Maillard compounds.

Key concepts: Maillard reaction, Chemistry, Xylose, Amadori rearrangement, Lipid oxidation, Organic chemistry, Cysteine, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of lipid on formation of Maillard and lipid‐Maillard meaty flavour compounds in heated cysteine‐xylose‐methyl linoleate system — Research Paper | ScholarLens