2022Environmental MicrobiologyRequires access

Growth of nitrite‐oxidizing Nitrospira and ammonia‐oxidizing Nitrosomonas in marine recirculating trickling biofilter reactors

Mamoru Oshiki, Hirotoshi Netsu, Kyohei Kuroda, Takashi Narihiro, Naoki Fujii, Tomonori Kindaichi, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Takahiro Watari, Masashi Hatamoto, Takashi Yamaguchi, Nobuo Araki, Satoshi Okabe

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Summary Aerobic ammonia and nitrite oxidation reactions are fundamental biogeochemical reactions contributing to the global nitrogen cycle. Although aerobic nitrite oxidation yields 4.8‐folds less Gibbs free energy ( ∆G r ) than aerobic ammonia oxidation in the NH 4 + ‐feeding marine recirculating trickling biofilter reactors operated in the present study, nitrite‐oxidizing and not ammonia‐oxidizing Nitrospira (sublineage IV) outnumbered ammonia‐oxidizing Nitrosomona s (relative abundance; 53.8% and 7.59% respectively). CO 2 assimilation efficiencies during ammonia or nitrite oxidation were 0.077 μmol‐ 14 CO 2 /μmol‐NH 3 and 0.053–0.054 μmol‐ 14 CO 2 /μmol‐NO 2 − respectively, and the difference between ammonia and nitrite oxidation was much smaller than the difference of ∆G r . Free‐energy efficiency of nitrite oxidation was higher than ammonia oxidation (31%–32% and 13% respectively), and high CO 2 assimilation and free‐energy efficiencies were a determinant for the dominance of Nitrospira over Nitrosomonas . Washout of Nitrospira and Nitrosomonas from the trickling biofilter reactors was also examined by quantitative PCR assay. Normalized copy numbers of Nitrosomonas amoA were 1.5‐ to 1.7‐folds greater than Nitrospira nxrB and 16S rRNA gene in the reactor effluents. Nitrosomonas was more susceptible for washout than Nitrospira in the trickling biofilter reactors, which was another determinant for the dominance of Nitrospira in the trickling biofilter reactors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Aerobic ammonia and nitrite oxidation reactions are fundamental biogeochemical reactions contributing to the global nitrogen cycle. Although aerobic nitrite oxidation yields 4.8‐folds less Gibbs free energy ( ∆G r ) than aerobic ammonia oxidation in the NH 4 + ‐feeding marine recirculating trickling biofilter reactors operated in the present study, nitrite‐oxidizing and not ammonia‐oxidizing Nitrospira (sublineage IV) outnumbered ammonia‐oxidizing Nitrosomona s (relative abundance; 53.8% and 7.59% respectively). CO 2 assimilation efficiencies during ammonia or nitrite oxidation were 0.077 μmol‐ 14 CO 2 /μmol‐NH 3 and 0.053–0.054 μmol‐ 14 CO 2 /μmol‐NO 2 − respectively, and the difference between ammonia and nitrite oxidation was much smaller than the difference of ∆G r . Free‐energy efficiency of nitrite oxidation was higher than ammonia oxidation (31%–32% and 13% respectively), and high CO 2 assimilation and free‐energy efficiencies were a determinant for the dominance of Nitrospira over Nitrosomonas . Washout of Nitrospira and Nitrosomonas from the trickling biofilter reactors was also examined by quantitative PCR assay. Normalized copy numbers of Nitrosomonas amoA were 1.5‐ to 1.7‐folds greater than Nitrospira nxrB and 16S rRNA gene in the reactor effluents. Nitrosomonas was more susceptible for washout than Nitrospira in the trickling biofilter reactors, which was another determinant for the dominance of Nitrospira in the trickling biofilter reactors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Aerobic ammonia and nitrite oxidation reactions are fundamental biogeochemical reactions contributing to the global nitrogen cycle. Although aerobic nitrite oxidation yields 4.8‐folds less Gibbs free energy ( ∆G r ) than aerobic ammonia oxidation in the NH 4 + ‐feeding marine recirculating trickling biofilter reactors operated in the present study, nitrite‐oxidizing and not ammonia‐oxidizing Nitrospira (sublineage IV) outnumbered ammonia‐oxidizing Nitrosomona s (relative abundance; 53.8% and 7.59% respectively). CO 2 assimilation efficiencies during ammonia or nitrite oxidation were 0.077 μmol‐ 14 CO 2 /μmol‐NH 3 and 0.053–0.054 μmol‐ 14 CO 2 /μmol‐NO 2 − respectively, and the difference between ammonia and nitrite oxidation was much smaller than the difference of ∆G r . Free‐energy efficiency of nitrite oxidation was higher than ammonia oxidation (31%–32% and 13% respectively), and high CO 2 assimilation and free‐energy efficiencies were a determinant for the dominance of Nitrospira over Nitrosomonas . Washout of Nitrospira and Nitrosomonas from the trickling biofilter reactors was also examined by quantitative PCR assay. Normalized copy numbers of Nitrosomonas amoA were 1.5‐ to 1.7‐folds greater than Nitrospira nxrB and 16S rRNA gene in the reactor effluents. Nitrosomonas was more susceptible for washout than Nitrospira in the trickling biofilter reactors, which was another determinant for the dominance of Nitrospira in the trickling biofilter reactors.

Key concepts: Nitrospira, Nitrosomonas, Nitrosomonas europaea, Nitrification, Nitrite, Nitrobacter, Biology, Environmental chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Growth of nitrite‐oxidizing Nitrospira and ammonia‐oxidizing Nitrosomonas in marine recirculating trickling biofilter reactors — Research Paper | ScholarLens