2022•Unpublished venueRequires access

2 Number in Eastern Dan

Valentin Vydrin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Number in Eastern Dan is marked, by default, by a plural word, dhȕn. There are also some other formal means: a specialized plural suffix for kinship terms and agent nouns; reduplication and tonal modifications for adjectives. The irregularities in plural marking are explained, to a great extent, by the Animacy Hierarchy. There are formal splits, marked in different ways: - between the 1st person and other pronouns; - between the pronouns for interlocutors and the 3rd person; - between the agent nouns and some kinship terms, on one hand, and all the other nouns, on the other; - between the names for humans, big animals and inanimate objects. There are two mechanisms to express verbal number. One of them, the full reduplication of the verb, is typologically common, while the other one, pluralization of the preverb, is unusual. Neither of these mechanisms can be regarded as an agreement with arguments; these are cases of a true pluriactionality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Number in Eastern Dan is marked, by default, by a plural word, dhȕn. There are also some other formal means: a specialized plural suffix for kinship terms and agent nouns; reduplication and tonal modifications for adjectives. The irregularities in plural marking are explained, to a great extent, by the Animacy Hierarchy. There are formal splits, marked in different ways: - between the 1st person and other pronouns; - between the pronouns for interlocutors and the 3rd person; - between the agent nouns and some kinship terms, on one hand, and all the other nouns, on the other; - between the names for humans, big animals and inanimate objects. There are two mechanisms to express verbal number. One of them, the full reduplication of the verb, is typologically common, while the other one, pluralization of the preverb, is unusual. Neither of these mechanisms can be regarded as an agreement with arguments; these are cases of a true pluriactionality.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Number in Eastern Dan is marked, by default, by a plural word, dhȕn. There are also some other formal means: a specialized plural suffix for kinship terms and agent nouns; reduplication and tonal modifications for adjectives. The irregularities in plural marking are explained, to a great extent, by the Animacy Hierarchy. There are formal splits, marked in different ways: - between the 1st person and other pronouns; - between the pronouns for interlocutors and the 3rd person; - between the agent nouns and some kinship terms, on one hand, and all the other nouns, on the other; - between the names for humans, big animals and inanimate objects. There are two mechanisms to express verbal number. One of them, the full reduplication of the verb, is typologically common, while the other one, pluralization of the preverb, is unusual. Neither of these mechanisms can be regarded as an agreement with arguments; these are cases of a true pluriactionality.

Key concepts: Plural, Animacy, Reduplication, Linguistics, Suffix, Noun, Verb, Kinship

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
2 Number in Eastern Dan — Research Paper | ScholarLens