2022•Royal Society Open ScienceOpen access

Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods

Nguyễn Quang Trung, Ádám Mechler, Nguyễn Thị Hoa, Quan V. Vo

Open full text 40 citations

Abstract

In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for the initial geometry and zero-point energy calculations, followed by the single-point BDE calculations with different model chemistries with the 6-311 + (3df,2p) basis set. It was found that the size of the basis set for geometry optimization has a much smaller effect on the accuracy of BDE than the choice of functional for the following single-point calculations. The M06-2X, M05-2X and M08−HX functionals yielded highly accurate BDE values compared to experimental data (with the average mean unsigned error MUE = 1.2–1.5 kcal mol −1 ), performing better than any of the other functionals. The results suggest that geometry optimization may be performed with B3LYP functional and a small basis set, whereas the M06-2X, M05-2X and M08-HX density functionals with a suitably large basis set offer the best method for calculating BDEs of ArX−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for the initial geometry and zero-point energy calculations, followed by the single-point BDE calculations with different model chemistries with the 6-311 + (3df,2p) basis set. It was found that the size of the basis set for geometry optimization has a much smaller effect on the accuracy of BDE than the choice of functional for the following single-point calculations. The M06-2X, M05-2X and M08−HX functionals yielded highly accurate BDE values compared to experimental data (with the average mean unsigned error MUE = 1.2–1.5 kcal mol −1 ), performing better than any of the other functionals. The results suggest that geometry optimization may be performed with B3LYP functional and a small basis set, whereas the M06-2X, M05-2X and M08-HX density functionals with a suitably large basis set offer the best method for calculating BDEs of ArX−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for the initial geometry and zero-point energy calculations, followed by the single-point BDE calculations with different model chemistries with the 6-311 + (3df,2p) basis set. It was found that the size of the basis set for geometry optimization has a much smaller effect on the accuracy of BDE than the choice of functional for the following single-point calculations. The M06-2X, M05-2X and M08−HX functionals yielded highly accurate BDE values compared to experimental data (with the average mean unsigned error MUE = 1.2–1.5 kcal mol −1 ), performing better than any of the other functionals. The results suggest that geometry optimization may be performed with B3LYP functional and a small basis set, whereas the M06-2X, M05-2X and M08-HX density functionals with a suitably large basis set offer the best method for calculating BDEs of ArX−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds.

Key concepts: Basis set, Bond-dissociation energy, Density functional theory, Basis (linear algebra), Dissociation (chemistry), Bond length, Energy minimization, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens