2022TaxonRequires access

(162) Proposal to add “first‐step typification” and “second‐step typification” to the Glossary

Jefferson Prado, Robbin C. Moran

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

According to Art. 9.17 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018), a second-step typification can be applied to a lecto-, neo-, or epitypification. In our experience, the terms first-step and second-step lectotypification are becoming more and more frequent in the taxonomic literature. The terms are implicitly explained in the context of Art. 9.17 and Ex. 14 but are absent from the Glossary. Because these terms are becoming more common, they should be explained in the Glossary. Accordingly, we propose the following. “first-step typification. See second-step typification.” “second-step typification. Designating a single specimen as the lectotype, neotype, or epitype for a name where a single gathering but more than one specimen was originally (in the first-step typification) designated as lectotype or neotype, or epitype (Art. 9.17 and Ex. 14).”

About this research paper

What this paper is about

According to Art. 9.17 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018), a second-step typification can be applied to a lecto-, neo-, or epitypification. In our experience, the terms first-step and second-step lectotypification are becoming more and more frequent in the taxonomic literature. The terms are implicitly explained in the context of Art. 9.17 and Ex. 14 but are absent from the Glossary. Because these terms are becoming more common, they should be explained in the Glossary. Accordingly, we propose the following. “first-step typification. See second-step typification.” “second-step typification. Designating a single specimen as the lectotype, neotype, or epitype for a name where a single gathering but more than one specimen was originally (in the first-step typification) designated as lectotype or neotype, or epitype (Art. 9.17 and Ex. 14).”

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

According to Art. 9.17 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018), a second-step typification can be applied to a lecto-, neo-, or epitypification. In our experience, the terms first-step and second-step lectotypification are becoming more and more frequent in the taxonomic literature. The terms are implicitly explained in the context of Art. 9.17 and Ex. 14 but are absent from the Glossary. Because these terms are becoming more common, they should be explained in the Glossary. Accordingly, we propose the following. “first-step typification. See second-step typification.” “second-step typification. Designating a single specimen as the lectotype, neotype, or epitype for a name where a single gathering but more than one specimen was originally (in the first-step typification) designated as lectotype or neotype, or epitype (Art. 9.17 and Ex. 14).”

Key concepts: Typification, Glossary, Context (archaeology), Nomenclature, Taxonomy (biology), Linguistics, Botany, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
(162) Proposal to add “first‐step typification” and “second‐step typification” to the Glossary — Research Paper | ScholarLens