2022Physical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsRequires access

Interpreting the variations in the kinetic and potential energies in the formation of a covalent bond

Timothy Clark, Peter Politzer, Jane S. Murray

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

We address the long-standing controversy as to the physical origin of covalent bonding, whether it involves a lowering of the potential energy or a lowering of the kinetic energy. We conclude that both of these do occur and contribute to the formation of the bond. The analysis is in terms of the virial theorem and the variations in the potential energy and the kinetic energy as the atoms approach each other. At large separations, the change in kinetic energy relative to the separated atoms is negative and stabilizing, while the corresponding potential energy change is positive and destabilizing. However, as the atoms approach their equilibrium separation, these rapidly reverse; the kinetic energy increases and the potential energy decreases, so that at equilibrium the net kinetic energy is positive and the net potential energy negative. At equilibrium, the bonding is due solely to the potential energy and is electrostatic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We address the long-standing controversy as to the physical origin of covalent bonding, whether it involves a lowering of the potential energy or a lowering of the kinetic energy. We conclude that both of these do occur and contribute to the formation of the bond. The analysis is in terms of the virial theorem and the variations in the potential energy and the kinetic energy as the atoms approach each other. At large separations, the change in kinetic energy relative to the separated atoms is negative and stabilizing, while the corresponding potential energy change is positive and destabilizing. However, as the atoms approach their equilibrium separation, these rapidly reverse; the kinetic energy increases and the potential energy decreases, so that at equilibrium the net kinetic energy is positive and the net potential energy negative. At equilibrium, the bonding is due solely to the potential energy and is electrostatic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We address the long-standing controversy as to the physical origin of covalent bonding, whether it involves a lowering of the potential energy or a lowering of the kinetic energy. We conclude that both of these do occur and contribute to the formation of the bond. The analysis is in terms of the virial theorem and the variations in the potential energy and the kinetic energy as the atoms approach each other. At large separations, the change in kinetic energy relative to the separated atoms is negative and stabilizing, while the corresponding potential energy change is positive and destabilizing. However, as the atoms approach their equilibrium separation, these rapidly reverse; the kinetic energy increases and the potential energy decreases, so that at equilibrium the net kinetic energy is positive and the net potential energy negative. At equilibrium, the bonding is due solely to the potential energy and is electrostatic.

Key concepts: Kinetic energy, Potential energy, Covalent bond, Virial theorem, Bond energy, Chemistry, Thermodynamics, Chemical physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interpreting the variations in the kinetic and potential energies in the formation of a covalent bond — Research Paper | ScholarLens