2013bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Supplementing the Record in the Federal Courts of Appeals: What If the Evidence You Need Is Not in the Record?

George C. Harris, Xiang Li

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The federal courts of appeals review district court orders and judgments on the basis of a closed record, which is limited to materials in the record when the district court made the decision under review.'This limitation is "fundamental" because appellate courts "lack the means to authenticate

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The federal courts of appeals review district court orders and judgments on the basis of a closed record, which is limited to materials in the record when the district court made the decision under review.'This limitation is "fundamental" because appellate courts "lack the means to authenticate

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The federal courts of appeals review district court orders and judgments on the basis of a closed record, which is limited to materials in the record when the district court made the decision under review.'This limitation is "fundamental" because appellate courts "lack the means to authenticate

Key concepts: Appeal, Law, Witness, Supreme court, Court of record, Political science, Trial court, Law of the case

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supplementing the Record in the Federal Courts of Appeals: What If the Evidence You Need Is Not in the Record? — Research Paper | ScholarLens