Supplementing the Record in the Federal Courts of Appeals: What If the Evidence You Need Is Not in the Record?
George C. Harris, Xiang Li
Abstract
Open-access reader
George C. Harris, Xiang Li
Abstract
Open-access reader
The federal courts of appeals review district court orders and judgments on the basis of a closed record, which is limited to materials in the record when the district court made the decision under review.'This limitation is "fundamental" because appellate courts "lack the means to authenticate
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The federal courts of appeals review district court orders and judgments on the basis of a closed record, which is limited to materials in the record when the district court made the decision under review.'This limitation is "fundamental" because appellate courts "lack the means to authenticate
Key concepts: Appeal, Law, Witness, Supreme court, Court of record, Political science, Trial court, Law of the case