Editor's Introduction
Nils H. Wessell
Abstract
Nils H. Wessell
Abstract
Every examination of politics in Russia seems to revolve around power. Not that power is irrelevant in any political context in any country. But the predominance of considerations of power—kto kogo [who over whom] may turn out to be Lenin's most lasting legacy—in any commentary on Russian politics is extraordinary, probably because of the chronic lack of legitimacy of Russian political institutions extending centuries into the past.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Every examination of politics in Russia seems to revolve around power. Not that power is irrelevant in any political context in any country. But the predominance of considerations of power—kto kogo [who over whom] may turn out to be Lenin's most lasting legacy—in any commentary on Russian politics is extraordinary, probably because of the chronic lack of legitimacy of Russian political institutions extending centuries into the past.
Key concepts: Legitimacy, Politics, Power (physics), Context (archaeology), Political science, Political economy, Sociology, Law