2016Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Relations as Plural-Predications in Plato

Theodore Scaltsas

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Plato was the first philosopher, to my awareness, to discover the metaphysical phenomenon of plural-subjects and plural-predication; e.g., you and I are two, but neither you nor I are two. I argue that Plato devised an ontology for plural-predication through his Theory of Forms, namely, plural-partaking in a Form. Furthermore, I argue that his account of plural-partaking can be employed to offer an ontology of related individuals without reifying relational Forms, which can explain their absence from Plato’s Theory of Forms. My contention is that a conception of plural-partaking in relative Forms—pairs of Opposites—can rest on the account Plato gives of plural-partaking in a Form. I hope that an account of related individuals through plural-predication will introduce a fresh approach to contemporary debates on the subject.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Plato was the first philosopher, to my awareness, to discover the metaphysical phenomenon of plural-subjects and plural-predication; e.g., you and I are two, but neither you nor I are two. I argue that Plato devised an ontology for plural-predication through his Theory of Forms, namely, plural-partaking in a Form. Furthermore, I argue that his account of plural-partaking can be employed to offer an ontology of related individuals without reifying relational Forms, which can explain their absence from Plato’s Theory of Forms. My contention is that a conception of plural-partaking in relative Forms—pairs of Opposites—can rest on the account Plato gives of plural-partaking in a Form. I hope that an account of related individuals through plural-predication will introduce a fresh approach to contemporary debates on the subject.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Plato was the first philosopher, to my awareness, to discover the metaphysical phenomenon of plural-subjects and plural-predication; e.g., you and I are two, but neither you nor I are two. I argue that Plato devised an ontology for plural-predication through his Theory of Forms, namely, plural-partaking in a Form. Furthermore, I argue that his account of plural-partaking can be employed to offer an ontology of related individuals without reifying relational Forms, which can explain their absence from Plato’s Theory of Forms. My contention is that a conception of plural-partaking in relative Forms—pairs of Opposites—can rest on the account Plato gives of plural-partaking in a Form. I hope that an account of related individuals through plural-predication will introduce a fresh approach to contemporary debates on the subject.

Key concepts: Plural, Metaphysics, Subject (documents), Epistemology, Ontology, Philosophy, Linguistics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relations as Plural-Predications in Plato — Research Paper | ScholarLens