1995Anesthesia & AnalgesiaRequires access

The Prone Positioning During General Anesthesia Minimally Affects Respiratory Mechanics While Improving Functional Residual Capacity and Increasing Oxygen Tension

Paolo Pelosi, M. Croci, Emiliana Calappi, Marco Cerisara, Davide Mulazzi, Pierluigi Vicardi, Luciano Gattinoni

Open publisher page 41 citations

Abstract

We investigated the effects of the prone position on the mechanical properties (compliance and resistance) of the total respiratory system, the lung, and the chest wall, and the functional residual capacity (FRC) and gas exchange in 17 normal, anesthetized, and paralyzed patients undergoing elective surgery.We used the esophageal balloon technique together with rapid airway occlusions during constant inspiratory flow to partition the mechanics of the respiratory system into its pulmonary and chest wall components. FRC was measured by the helium dilution technique. Measurements were taken in the supine position and after 20 min in the prone position maintaining the same respiratory pattern (tidal volume 10 mL/kg, respiratory rate 14 breaths/min, FIO2 0.4). We found that the prone position did not significantly affect the respiratory system compliance (80.9 +/- 16.6 vs 75.9 +/- 13.2 mL/cm H2 O) or the lung and chest wall compliance. Respiratory resistance slightly increased in the prone position (4.8 +/- 2.5 vs 5.4 +/- 2.7 cm H2 O centered dot L-1 centered dot s, P < 0.05), mainly due to the chest wall resistance (1.3 +/- 0.6 vs 1.9 +/- 0.8 cm H2 O centered dot L-1 centered dot s, P < 0.05). Both FRC and PaO2 markedly (P < 0.01) increased from the supine to the prone position (1.9 +/- 0.6 vs 2.9 +/- 0.7 L, P < 0.01, and 160 +/- 37 vs 199 +/- 16 mm Hg, P < 0.01, respectively), whereas PaCO2 was unchanged. In conclusion, the prone position during general anesthesia does not negatively affect respiratory mechanics and improves lung volumes and oxygenation. (Anesth Analg 1995;80:955-60)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We investigated the effects of the prone position on the mechanical properties (compliance and resistance) of the total respiratory system, the lung, and the chest wall, and the functional residual capacity (FRC) and gas exchange in 17 normal, anesthetized, and paralyzed patients undergoing elective surgery.We used the esophageal balloon technique together with rapid airway occlusions during constant inspiratory flow to partition the mechanics of the respiratory system into its pulmonary and chest wall components. FRC was measured by the helium dilution technique. Measurements were taken in the supine position and after 20 min in the prone position maintaining the same respiratory pattern (tidal volume 10 mL/kg, respiratory rate 14 breaths/min, FIO2 0.4). We found that the prone position did not significantly affect the respiratory system compliance (80.9 +/- 16.6 vs 75.9 +/- 13.2 mL/cm H2 O) or the lung and chest wall compliance. Respiratory resistance slightly increased in the prone position (4.8 +/- 2.5 vs 5.4 +/- 2.7 cm H2 O centered dot L-1 centered dot s, P < 0.05), mainly due to the chest wall resistance (1.3 +/- 0.6 vs 1.9 +/- 0.8 cm H2 O centered dot L-1 centered dot s, P < 0.05). Both FRC and PaO2 markedly (P < 0.01) increased from the supine to the prone position (1.9 +/- 0.6 vs 2.9 +/- 0.7 L, P < 0.01, and 160 +/- 37 vs 199 +/- 16 mm Hg, P < 0.01, respectively), whereas PaCO2 was unchanged. In conclusion, the prone position during general anesthesia does not negatively affect respiratory mechanics and improves lung volumes and oxygenation. (Anesth Analg 1995;80:955-60)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We investigated the effects of the prone position on the mechanical properties (compliance and resistance) of the total respiratory system, the lung, and the chest wall, and the functional residual capacity (FRC) and gas exchange in 17 normal, anesthetized, and paralyzed patients undergoing elective surgery.We used the esophageal balloon technique together with rapid airway occlusions during constant inspiratory flow to partition the mechanics of the respiratory system into its pulmonary and chest wall components. FRC was measured by the helium dilution technique. Measurements were taken in the supine position and after 20 min in the prone position maintaining the same respiratory pattern (tidal volume 10 mL/kg, respiratory rate 14 breaths/min, FIO2 0.4). We found that the prone position did not significantly affect the respiratory system compliance (80.9 +/- 16.6 vs 75.9 +/- 13.2 mL/cm H2 O) or the lung and chest wall compliance. Respiratory resistance slightly increased in the prone position (4.8 +/- 2.5 vs 5.4 +/- 2.7 cm H2 O centered dot L-1 centered dot s, P < 0.05), mainly due to the chest wall resistance (1.3 +/- 0.6 vs 1.9 +/- 0.8 cm H2 O centered dot L-1 centered dot s, P < 0.05). Both FRC and PaO2 markedly (P < 0.01) increased from the supine to the prone position (1.9 +/- 0.6 vs 2.9 +/- 0.7 L, P < 0.01, and 160 +/- 37 vs 199 +/- 16 mm Hg, P < 0.01, respectively), whereas PaCO2 was unchanged. In conclusion, the prone position during general anesthesia does not negatively affect respiratory mechanics and improves lung volumes and oxygenation. (Anesth Analg 1995;80:955-60)

Key concepts: Functional residual capacity, Medicine, Supine position, Prone position, Respiratory physiology, Lung volumes, Pulmonary compliance, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Prone Positioning During General Anesthesia Minimally Affects Respiratory Mechanics While Improving Functional Residual Capacity and Increasing Oxygen Tension — Research Paper | ScholarLens