2017The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research MethodsRequires access

Intersubjectivity

Soyoung Bae

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Intersubjectivity can be viewed as the middle ground between objectivity and subjectivity because it contains characteristics of both epistemological stances. Intersubjectivity is focused on the belief that research is neither purely objective nor purely subjective in nature. In this entry intersubjectivity is described as agreement among scientists occurring via communication and the sharing of meanings regarding their research objects and research contexts. The assumptions on symbolic interactionism are provided to help better understand intersubjectivity based on how the meanings attached to objects are shared among people through interactions. Finally, two classifications of intersubjectivity are introduced. Three commonalities from these classifications are intersubjectivity by regimentation/standardization, intersubjectivity by explicitness/explication, and dialogical intersubjectivity/members check.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Intersubjectivity can be viewed as the middle ground between objectivity and subjectivity because it contains characteristics of both epistemological stances. Intersubjectivity is focused on the belief that research is neither purely objective nor purely subjective in nature. In this entry intersubjectivity is described as agreement among scientists occurring via communication and the sharing of meanings regarding their research objects and research contexts. The assumptions on symbolic interactionism are provided to help better understand intersubjectivity based on how the meanings attached to objects are shared among people through interactions. Finally, two classifications of intersubjectivity are introduced. Three commonalities from these classifications are intersubjectivity by regimentation/standardization, intersubjectivity by explicitness/explication, and dialogical intersubjectivity/members check.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Intersubjectivity can be viewed as the middle ground between objectivity and subjectivity because it contains characteristics of both epistemological stances. Intersubjectivity is focused on the belief that research is neither purely objective nor purely subjective in nature. In this entry intersubjectivity is described as agreement among scientists occurring via communication and the sharing of meanings regarding their research objects and research contexts. The assumptions on symbolic interactionism are provided to help better understand intersubjectivity based on how the meanings attached to objects are shared among people through interactions. Finally, two classifications of intersubjectivity are introduced. Three commonalities from these classifications are intersubjectivity by regimentation/standardization, intersubjectivity by explicitness/explication, and dialogical intersubjectivity/members check.

Key concepts: Intersubjectivity, Subjectivity, Dialogical self, Epistemology, Psychology, Explication, Objectivity (philosophy), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intersubjectivity — Research Paper | ScholarLens