2001Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

First-order Peano Arithmetic

Peter J. Smith

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Q is Σ 1 -complete, a fact which will turn out to be very important. But, as we saw, in other ways Q is an extremely weak theory. To derive elementary general truths like ∀x(0 + x = x) that are beyond Q's reach, we obviously will have to use a formal arithmetic that incorporates some stronger axiom(s) for proving quantified wffs. This chapter explains the induction axioms we need to add, working up to the key theory PA, first-order Peano Arithmetic . Induction and the Induction Schema (a) In informal argumentation, we frequently appeal to the following principle of mathematical induction in order to prove general claims: Suppose (i) 0 has the numerical property P . And suppose (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then its successor n + 1 also has P . Then we can conclude that (iii) every number has property P . In fact, we used informal inductions in the last chapter. For example, to prove that Q correctly decides all Σ 1 wffs, we in effect began: let n have the property P if Q-correctly-decides-Σ 1 -wffs-of-degree-no-more-than n . Then we argued (i) 0 has property P , and (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then n + 1 also has P . So we concluded (iii) every number has P , i.e. Q correctly decides any Σ 1 wff, whatever its degree.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Q is Σ 1 -complete, a fact which will turn out to be very important. But, as we saw, in other ways Q is an extremely weak theory. To derive elementary general truths like ∀x(0 + x = x) that are beyond Q's reach, we obviously will have to use a formal arithmetic that incorporates some stronger axiom(s) for proving quantified wffs. This chapter explains the induction axioms we need to add, working up to the key theory PA, first-order Peano Arithmetic . Induction and the Induction Schema (a) In informal argumentation, we frequently appeal to the following principle of mathematical induction in order to prove general claims: Suppose (i) 0 has the numerical property P . And suppose (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then its successor n + 1 also has P . Then we can conclude that (iii) every number has property P . In fact, we used informal inductions in the last chapter. For example, to prove that Q correctly decides all Σ 1 wffs, we in effect began: let n have the property P if Q-correctly-decides-Σ 1 -wffs-of-degree-no-more-than n . Then we argued (i) 0 has property P , and (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then n + 1 also has P . So we concluded (iii) every number has P , i.e. Q correctly decides any Σ 1 wff, whatever its degree.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Q is Σ 1 -complete, a fact which will turn out to be very important. But, as we saw, in other ways Q is an extremely weak theory. To derive elementary general truths like ∀x(0 + x = x) that are beyond Q's reach, we obviously will have to use a formal arithmetic that incorporates some stronger axiom(s) for proving quantified wffs. This chapter explains the induction axioms we need to add, working up to the key theory PA, first-order Peano Arithmetic . Induction and the Induction Schema (a) In informal argumentation, we frequently appeal to the following principle of mathematical induction in order to prove general claims: Suppose (i) 0 has the numerical property P . And suppose (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then its successor n + 1 also has P . Then we can conclude that (iii) every number has property P . In fact, we used informal inductions in the last chapter. For example, to prove that Q correctly decides all Σ 1 wffs, we in effect began: let n have the property P if Q-correctly-decides-Σ 1 -wffs-of-degree-no-more-than n . Then we argued (i) 0 has property P , and (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then n + 1 also has P . So we concluded (iii) every number has P , i.e. Q correctly decides any Σ 1 wff, whatever its degree.

Key concepts: Peano axioms, Second-order arithmetic, Axiom, Arithmetic, Mathematics, Order (exchange), Key (lock), Axiomatic system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
First-order Peano Arithmetic — Research Paper | ScholarLens