First-order Peano Arithmetic
Peter J. Smith
Abstract
Peter J. Smith
Abstract
Q is Σ 1 -complete, a fact which will turn out to be very important. But, as we saw, in other ways Q is an extremely weak theory. To derive elementary general truths like ∀x(0 + x = x) that are beyond Q's reach, we obviously will have to use a formal arithmetic that incorporates some stronger axiom(s) for proving quantified wffs. This chapter explains the induction axioms we need to add, working up to the key theory PA, first-order Peano Arithmetic . Induction and the Induction Schema (a) In informal argumentation, we frequently appeal to the following principle of mathematical induction in order to prove general claims: Suppose (i) 0 has the numerical property P . And suppose (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then its successor n + 1 also has P . Then we can conclude that (iii) every number has property P . In fact, we used informal inductions in the last chapter. For example, to prove that Q correctly decides all Σ 1 wffs, we in effect began: let n have the property P if Q-correctly-decides-Σ 1 -wffs-of-degree-no-more-than n . Then we argued (i) 0 has property P , and (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then n + 1 also has P . So we concluded (iii) every number has P , i.e. Q correctly decides any Σ 1 wff, whatever its degree.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Q is Σ 1 -complete, a fact which will turn out to be very important. But, as we saw, in other ways Q is an extremely weak theory. To derive elementary general truths like ∀x(0 + x = x) that are beyond Q's reach, we obviously will have to use a formal arithmetic that incorporates some stronger axiom(s) for proving quantified wffs. This chapter explains the induction axioms we need to add, working up to the key theory PA, first-order Peano Arithmetic . Induction and the Induction Schema (a) In informal argumentation, we frequently appeal to the following principle of mathematical induction in order to prove general claims: Suppose (i) 0 has the numerical property P . And suppose (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then its successor n + 1 also has P . Then we can conclude that (iii) every number has property P . In fact, we used informal inductions in the last chapter. For example, to prove that Q correctly decides all Σ 1 wffs, we in effect began: let n have the property P if Q-correctly-decides-Σ 1 -wffs-of-degree-no-more-than n . Then we argued (i) 0 has property P , and (ii) for any number n , if it has P , then n + 1 also has P . So we concluded (iii) every number has P , i.e. Q correctly decides any Σ 1 wff, whatever its degree.
Key concepts: Peano axioms, Second-order arithmetic, Axiom, Arithmetic, Mathematics, Order (exchange), Key (lock), Axiomatic system