1999•The American NaturalistRequires access

Untitled research work

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

We explore the evolution of dominance at polymorphisms maintained either by overdominant selection or by migration‐selection balance. At such balanced polymorphisms, heterozygotes remain at appreciable frequencies over long periods of time, allowing extensive modification of dominance to occur. The strength of selection favoring a modifier of dominance is roughly proportional to the probability that a modifier allele is found in a heterozygote at the locus subject to balancing selection times the heterozygote fitness increase caused by the modifier. Using a two‐locus model, we elucidate the interesting ways in which recombination and migration cause departures from this rough expectation. For example, with overdominance, a genetic association with the rarest allele favors a modifier that increases heterozygote fitness because the modifier occurs more often in heterozygotes. With migration‐selection balance, dominance evolves more readily in patches experiencing the strongest selection. We also find that, while there are more heterozygotes in sink populations (which have higher rates of immigration than emigration), selection for dominance in sink and source populations is nearly equal because sink populations make a lower genetic contribution to future generations. We conclude that the evolution of dominance is likely to occur whenever polymorphism is maintained by either overdominance or migration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We explore the evolution of dominance at polymorphisms maintained either by overdominant selection or by migration‐selection balance. At such balanced polymorphisms, heterozygotes remain at appreciable frequencies over long periods of time, allowing extensive modification of dominance to occur. The strength of selection favoring a modifier of dominance is roughly proportional to the probability that a modifier allele is found in a heterozygote at the locus subject to balancing selection times the heterozygote fitness increase caused by the modifier. Using a two‐locus model, we elucidate the interesting ways in which recombination and migration cause departures from this rough expectation. For example, with overdominance, a genetic association with the rarest allele favors a modifier that increases heterozygote fitness because the modifier occurs more often in heterozygotes. With migration‐selection balance, dominance evolves more readily in patches experiencing the strongest selection. We also find that, while there are more heterozygotes in sink populations (which have higher rates of immigration than emigration), selection for dominance in sink and source populations is nearly equal because sink populations make a lower genetic contribution to future generations. We conclude that the evolution of dominance is likely to occur whenever polymorphism is maintained by either overdominance or migration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We explore the evolution of dominance at polymorphisms maintained either by overdominant selection or by migration‐selection balance. At such balanced polymorphisms, heterozygotes remain at appreciable frequencies over long periods of time, allowing extensive modification of dominance to occur. The strength of selection favoring a modifier of dominance is roughly proportional to the probability that a modifier allele is found in a heterozygote at the locus subject to balancing selection times the heterozygote fitness increase caused by the modifier. Using a two‐locus model, we elucidate the interesting ways in which recombination and migration cause departures from this rough expectation. For example, with overdominance, a genetic association with the rarest allele favors a modifier that increases heterozygote fitness because the modifier occurs more often in heterozygotes. With migration‐selection balance, dominance evolves more readily in patches experiencing the strongest selection. We also find that, while there are more heterozygotes in sink populations (which have higher rates of immigration than emigration), selection for dominance in sink and source populations is nearly equal because sink populations make a lower genetic contribution to future generations. We conclude that the evolution of dominance is likely to occur whenever polymorphism is maintained by either overdominance or migration.

Key concepts: Overdominance, Heterozygote advantage, Allele, Biology, Dominance (genetics), Genetics, Balancing selection, Locus (genetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Untitled research work — Research Paper | ScholarLens