2003•The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchRequires access

Improvement in Running Economy After 6 Weeks of Plyometric Training

AMANDA M. TURNER, MATT OWINGS, JAMES A. SCHWANE

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

This study determined whether a 6-week regimen of plyometric training would improve running economy (i.e., the oxygen cost of submaximal running). Eighteen regular but not highly trained distance runners (age = 29 ± 7 [mean ± SD] years) were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. All subjects continued regular running training for 6 weeks; experimental subjects also did plyometric training. Dependent variables measured before and after the 6-week period were economy of running on a level treadmill at 3 velocities (women: 2.23, 2.68, and 3.13 m-s1; men: 2.68, 3.13, and 3.58 m-s1), Vo2max, and indirect indicators of ability of muscles of lower limbs to store and return elastic energy. The last were measurements during jumping tests on an inclined (20°) sled: maximal jump height with and without countermovement and efficiencies of series of 40 sub-maximal countermovement and static jumps. The plyometric training improved economy (p < 0.05). Averaged values (m-ml-kg“1) for the 3 running speeds were: (a) experimental subjects—5.14 ± 0.39 pretraining, 5.26 ± 0.39 posttrain-ing; and (b) control subjects—5.10 ± 0.36 pretraining, 5.06 ± 0.36 posttraining. The Vo2max did not change with training. Plyometric training did not result in changes in jump height or efficiency variables that would have indicated improved ability to store and return elastic energy. We conclude that 6 weeks of plyometric training improves running economy in regular but not highly trained distance runners; the mechanism must still be determined.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study determined whether a 6-week regimen of plyometric training would improve running economy (i.e., the oxygen cost of submaximal running). Eighteen regular but not highly trained distance runners (age = 29 ± 7 [mean ± SD] years) were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. All subjects continued regular running training for 6 weeks; experimental subjects also did plyometric training. Dependent variables measured before and after the 6-week period were economy of running on a level treadmill at 3 velocities (women: 2.23, 2.68, and 3.13 m-s1; men: 2.68, 3.13, and 3.58 m-s1), Vo2max, and indirect indicators of ability of muscles of lower limbs to store and return elastic energy. The last were measurements during jumping tests on an inclined (20°) sled: maximal jump height with and without countermovement and efficiencies of series of 40 sub-maximal countermovement and static jumps. The plyometric training improved economy (p < 0.05). Averaged values (m-ml-kg“1) for the 3 running speeds were: (a) experimental subjects—5.14 ± 0.39 pretraining, 5.26 ± 0.39 posttrain-ing; and (b) control subjects—5.10 ± 0.36 pretraining, 5.06 ± 0.36 posttraining. The Vo2max did not change with training. Plyometric training did not result in changes in jump height or efficiency variables that would have indicated improved ability to store and return elastic energy. We conclude that 6 weeks of plyometric training improves running economy in regular but not highly trained distance runners; the mechanism must still be determined.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study determined whether a 6-week regimen of plyometric training would improve running economy (i.e., the oxygen cost of submaximal running). Eighteen regular but not highly trained distance runners (age = 29 ± 7 [mean ± SD] years) were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. All subjects continued regular running training for 6 weeks; experimental subjects also did plyometric training. Dependent variables measured before and after the 6-week period were economy of running on a level treadmill at 3 velocities (women: 2.23, 2.68, and 3.13 m-s1; men: 2.68, 3.13, and 3.58 m-s1), Vo2max, and indirect indicators of ability of muscles of lower limbs to store and return elastic energy. The last were measurements during jumping tests on an inclined (20°) sled: maximal jump height with and without countermovement and efficiencies of series of 40 sub-maximal countermovement and static jumps. The plyometric training improved economy (p < 0.05). Averaged values (m-ml-kg“1) for the 3 running speeds were: (a) experimental subjects—5.14 ± 0.39 pretraining, 5.26 ± 0.39 posttrain-ing; and (b) control subjects—5.10 ± 0.36 pretraining, 5.06 ± 0.36 posttraining. The Vo2max did not change with training. Plyometric training did not result in changes in jump height or efficiency variables that would have indicated improved ability to store and return elastic energy. We conclude that 6 weeks of plyometric training improves running economy in regular but not highly trained distance runners; the mechanism must still be determined.

Key concepts: Running economy, Plyometrics, Mathematics, Jumping, Stretch shortening cycle, Jump, Physical therapy, Treadmill

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improvement in Running Economy After 6 Weeks of Plyometric Training — Research Paper | ScholarLens