2019The International Encyclopedia of EthicsRequires access

Commodification

Adrian Walsh

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Are there some things that should not be commodified? By “commodification,” we mean the process of transforming a good or an activity into a commodity that is available on the market. How extensive should that market be? For instance, should kidneys, water, professional soldiers, or sexual services be available on the market? Are there reasons to prevent the buying and selling of certain kinds of goods, or might we permissibly allow the commodification of everything that can be commodified? In this entry, a range of ethical and political topics concerning the social process of commodification is explored. The entry begins by considering how one might best define commodification. It then turns to a range of objections to the idea of universal commodification made by both socialist and modern liberal critics, before exploring recent defenses of expanding the range of things we can buy and sell. Particular attention is given to the ethical underpinnings of what are fundamentally political objections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Are there some things that should not be commodified? By “commodification,” we mean the process of transforming a good or an activity into a commodity that is available on the market. How extensive should that market be? For instance, should kidneys, water, professional soldiers, or sexual services be available on the market? Are there reasons to prevent the buying and selling of certain kinds of goods, or might we permissibly allow the commodification of everything that can be commodified? In this entry, a range of ethical and political topics concerning the social process of commodification is explored. The entry begins by considering how one might best define commodification. It then turns to a range of objections to the idea of universal commodification made by both socialist and modern liberal critics, before exploring recent defenses of expanding the range of things we can buy and sell. Particular attention is given to the ethical underpinnings of what are fundamentally political objections.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Are there some things that should not be commodified? By “commodification,” we mean the process of transforming a good or an activity into a commodity that is available on the market. How extensive should that market be? For instance, should kidneys, water, professional soldiers, or sexual services be available on the market? Are there reasons to prevent the buying and selling of certain kinds of goods, or might we permissibly allow the commodification of everything that can be commodified? In this entry, a range of ethical and political topics concerning the social process of commodification is explored. The entry begins by considering how one might best define commodification. It then turns to a range of objections to the idea of universal commodification made by both socialist and modern liberal critics, before exploring recent defenses of expanding the range of things we can buy and sell. Particular attention is given to the ethical underpinnings of what are fundamentally political objections.

Key concepts: Commodification, Commodity, Politics, Sociology, Law and economics, Political science, Law, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Commodification — Research Paper | ScholarLens