2014•Unpublished venueOpen access

Process morphology

Sharon Inkelas

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract The counterpart to morphologically conditioned phonology is morphology which is manifested as a phonological process other than concatenation of morphemes. When such a process is the sole mark of a morphological category, the interchangeable terms “realizational morphology” and “process morphology” apply. This chapter surveys process morphology and compares it to morphologically conditioned phonology. Process morphology is a challenge to morphological theories which are highly item-based: not every case of process morphology can be reanalyzed as additive. How a particular phonological process is characterized—as morphologically conditioned phonology or process morphology—is highly relevant to the diagnosis of multiple exponence. The close study of process morphology potentially informs theories of morphologically conditioned phonology and bears on the testing of hypotheses regarding the range of variation within a given language in its phonological patterns.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The counterpart to morphologically conditioned phonology is morphology which is manifested as a phonological process other than concatenation of morphemes. When such a process is the sole mark of a morphological category, the interchangeable terms “realizational morphology” and “process morphology” apply. This chapter surveys process morphology and compares it to morphologically conditioned phonology. Process morphology is a challenge to morphological theories which are highly item-based: not every case of process morphology can be reanalyzed as additive. How a particular phonological process is characterized—as morphologically conditioned phonology or process morphology—is highly relevant to the diagnosis of multiple exponence. The close study of process morphology potentially informs theories of morphologically conditioned phonology and bears on the testing of hypotheses regarding the range of variation within a given language in its phonological patterns.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The counterpart to morphologically conditioned phonology is morphology which is manifested as a phonological process other than concatenation of morphemes. When such a process is the sole mark of a morphological category, the interchangeable terms “realizational morphology” and “process morphology” apply. This chapter surveys process morphology and compares it to morphologically conditioned phonology. Process morphology is a challenge to morphological theories which are highly item-based: not every case of process morphology can be reanalyzed as additive. How a particular phonological process is characterized—as morphologically conditioned phonology or process morphology—is highly relevant to the diagnosis of multiple exponence. The close study of process morphology potentially informs theories of morphologically conditioned phonology and bears on the testing of hypotheses regarding the range of variation within a given language in its phonological patterns.

Key concepts: Morphology (biology), Phonology, Morpheme, Process (computing), Concatenation (mathematics), Linguistics, Computer science, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Process morphology — Research Paper | ScholarLens