2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Conclusion

K.J. Kesselring

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract The conclusion sums up ways in which the manslaughter verdict became a useful mechanism for criminalizing homicide, or making murder public, and thus how it might have contributed to the declining incidence of homicide in the period. It surveys the responses to a number of killings by elite men at the end of the period, and how these responses show signs of the broader changes under discussion in the book. It ends with a brief summary of the political aspects of homicide and its prosecution, and addresses how talk of murder as an offence against a collectivity beyond king and kin both drew upon broad participation and served to exclude some people from law’s protections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The conclusion sums up ways in which the manslaughter verdict became a useful mechanism for criminalizing homicide, or making murder public, and thus how it might have contributed to the declining incidence of homicide in the period. It surveys the responses to a number of killings by elite men at the end of the period, and how these responses show signs of the broader changes under discussion in the book. It ends with a brief summary of the political aspects of homicide and its prosecution, and addresses how talk of murder as an offence against a collectivity beyond king and kin both drew upon broad participation and served to exclude some people from law’s protections.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The conclusion sums up ways in which the manslaughter verdict became a useful mechanism for criminalizing homicide, or making murder public, and thus how it might have contributed to the declining incidence of homicide in the period. It surveys the responses to a number of killings by elite men at the end of the period, and how these responses show signs of the broader changes under discussion in the book. It ends with a brief summary of the political aspects of homicide and its prosecution, and addresses how talk of murder as an offence against a collectivity beyond king and kin both drew upon broad participation and served to exclude some people from law’s protections.

Key concepts: Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conclusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens