2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ Revisited (1997)

Thomas J. Mathiesen

Open publisher page 130 citations

Abstract

In 1975 Michel Foucault published his widely acclaimed and important book Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. The year is 1838, and Foucault’s source now is the rules for ‘the house of young prisoners in Paris’. The enormous popularity of the film implied the gathering of large crowds of people in large film theatres, blatantly contradicting Foucault’s thesis that in modern times we have moved away from the situation where the many see the few, away from synopticism. In the older context, ‘sender’ and ‘receiver’ were in each other’s proximity, be it in the ancient theatre or the festivals and image-building of the Colosseum; in the modern media context, distance between the two may be great. The information professionals are trained to filter information, and to present images which are favourable to the institution or organization in question. The older institutions of spectacle differed in several respects from the modern ones.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1975 Michel Foucault published his widely acclaimed and important book Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. The year is 1838, and Foucault’s source now is the rules for ‘the house of young prisoners in Paris’. The enormous popularity of the film implied the gathering of large crowds of people in large film theatres, blatantly contradicting Foucault’s thesis that in modern times we have moved away from the situation where the many see the few, away from synopticism. In the older context, ‘sender’ and ‘receiver’ were in each other’s proximity, be it in the ancient theatre or the festivals and image-building of the Colosseum; in the modern media context, distance between the two may be great. The information professionals are trained to filter information, and to present images which are favourable to the institution or organization in question. The older institutions of spectacle differed in several respects from the modern ones.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 130 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1975 Michel Foucault published his widely acclaimed and important book Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. The year is 1838, and Foucault’s source now is the rules for ‘the house of young prisoners in Paris’. The enormous popularity of the film implied the gathering of large crowds of people in large film theatres, blatantly contradicting Foucault’s thesis that in modern times we have moved away from the situation where the many see the few, away from synopticism. In the older context, ‘sender’ and ‘receiver’ were in each other’s proximity, be it in the ancient theatre or the festivals and image-building of the Colosseum; in the modern media context, distance between the two may be great. The information professionals are trained to filter information, and to present images which are favourable to the institution or organization in question. The older institutions of spectacle differed in several respects from the modern ones.

Key concepts: Panopticon, Michel foucault, Sociology, Psychoanalysis, Art history, Philosophy, Epistemology, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ Revisited (1997) — Research Paper | ScholarLens