1999•European Journal of Social PsychologyRequires access

Differential evaluations of likeable and dislikeable behaviours enacted towards superiors and subordinates

Roos Vonk

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Subjects (N=129) judged the favourability of 20 behaviours enacted towards either subordinates or superiors of the actor. Likeable behaviours were evaluated more moderately when they were enacted towards superiors, indicating that subjects took into account the possibility that the actor was engaging in ingratiation. Moderately dislikeable behaviours were evaluated more negatively when they were enacted towards subordinates, suggesting that their negative meaning was strengthened when the behavioural target was powerless. Extremely dislikeable behaviours were evaluated negatively regardless of the persons towards whom they were enacted. These results suggest that, in interpreting positive and moderate (i.e. ambiguous) behaviours, characteristics of the behavioural targets are used to determine the actor's intentions and, thereby, the evaluative meaning of the behaviour. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Subjects (N=129) judged the favourability of 20 behaviours enacted towards either subordinates or superiors of the actor. Likeable behaviours were evaluated more moderately when they were enacted towards superiors, indicating that subjects took into account the possibility that the actor was engaging in ingratiation. Moderately dislikeable behaviours were evaluated more negatively when they were enacted towards subordinates, suggesting that their negative meaning was strengthened when the behavioural target was powerless. Extremely dislikeable behaviours were evaluated negatively regardless of the persons towards whom they were enacted. These results suggest that, in interpreting positive and moderate (i.e. ambiguous) behaviours, characteristics of the behavioural targets are used to determine the actor's intentions and, thereby, the evaluative meaning of the behaviour. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Subjects (N=129) judged the favourability of 20 behaviours enacted towards either subordinates or superiors of the actor. Likeable behaviours were evaluated more moderately when they were enacted towards superiors, indicating that subjects took into account the possibility that the actor was engaging in ingratiation. Moderately dislikeable behaviours were evaluated more negatively when they were enacted towards subordinates, suggesting that their negative meaning was strengthened when the behavioural target was powerless. Extremely dislikeable behaviours were evaluated negatively regardless of the persons towards whom they were enacted. These results suggest that, in interpreting positive and moderate (i.e. ambiguous) behaviours, characteristics of the behavioural targets are used to determine the actor's intentions and, thereby, the evaluative meaning of the behaviour. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Key concepts: Psychology, Meaning (existential), Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Psychotherapist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differential evaluations of likeable and dislikeable behaviours enacted towards superiors and subordinates — Research Paper | ScholarLens