1986Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972)Requires access

How well do bacon grade schedules reflect carcass composition?

A. J. Kempster, Alison Monk

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Most bacon carcasses in Britain are measured, within the national Pig Carcase Classification Scheme operated by the Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC), for P2 fat thickness, shoulder and loin fat thicknesses and carcass length. Bacon curers use these measurements to define the grading schedules most appropriate to their buying requirements. There is debate about the value of mid-line fat measurements and length as indicators of carcass quality. The scientific evidence indicates that mid-line measurements are less precise predictors of carcass lean content than P2, and that the mid-line loin measurement is superior to the mid-line shoulder measurement.However, it is argued that the mid-line measurements may have special regional value: eg as predictors of carcass lean content in individual joints. The analysis reported uses a computer model (PIGRADER) to examine overall lean in carcass, the composition of individual joints and joint proportions for alternative grading schedules.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most bacon carcasses in Britain are measured, within the national Pig Carcase Classification Scheme operated by the Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC), for P2 fat thickness, shoulder and loin fat thicknesses and carcass length. Bacon curers use these measurements to define the grading schedules most appropriate to their buying requirements. There is debate about the value of mid-line fat measurements and length as indicators of carcass quality. The scientific evidence indicates that mid-line measurements are less precise predictors of carcass lean content than P2, and that the mid-line loin measurement is superior to the mid-line shoulder measurement.However, it is argued that the mid-line measurements may have special regional value: eg as predictors of carcass lean content in individual joints. The analysis reported uses a computer model (PIGRADER) to examine overall lean in carcass, the composition of individual joints and joint proportions for alternative grading schedules.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most bacon carcasses in Britain are measured, within the national Pig Carcase Classification Scheme operated by the Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC), for P2 fat thickness, shoulder and loin fat thicknesses and carcass length. Bacon curers use these measurements to define the grading schedules most appropriate to their buying requirements. There is debate about the value of mid-line fat measurements and length as indicators of carcass quality. The scientific evidence indicates that mid-line measurements are less precise predictors of carcass lean content than P2, and that the mid-line loin measurement is superior to the mid-line shoulder measurement.However, it is argued that the mid-line measurements may have special regional value: eg as predictors of carcass lean content in individual joints. The analysis reported uses a computer model (PIGRADER) to examine overall lean in carcass, the composition of individual joints and joint proportions for alternative grading schedules.

Key concepts: Loin, Lean meat, Grading (engineering), Lean tissue, Carcass weight, Composition (language), Mathematics, Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How well do bacon grade schedules reflect carcass composition? — Research Paper | ScholarLens