2004Cochlear Implants InternationalRequires access

Localization performance of unilateral cochlear implant users for speech, tones and noise

Roberta Buhagiar, ME Lutman, JE Brinton, J Eyles

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implants aim to improve sound localization compared to monaural implants, among other potential benefits. Monaural cochlear implants should not support localization in the horizontal plane as there are no interaural level and time difference cues available, although some previous studies have suggested limited capability. As background to other studies of bilateral implantation, the localization abilities of 18 monaural cochlear implantees were investigated experimentally in an anechoic chamber, using various sound stimuli with different amounts of temporal information. The effects of head movement and reverberation were also investigated. Localization performance was found to be close to chance for all stimuli. It is confirmed that monaural cochlear implants are unable to support useful auditory sound localization, even when head movements are allowed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Bilateral cochlear implants aim to improve sound localization compared to monaural implants, among other potential benefits. Monaural cochlear implants should not support localization in the horizontal plane as there are no interaural level and time difference cues available, although some previous studies have suggested limited capability. As background to other studies of bilateral implantation, the localization abilities of 18 monaural cochlear implantees were investigated experimentally in an anechoic chamber, using various sound stimuli with different amounts of temporal information. The effects of head movement and reverberation were also investigated. Localization performance was found to be close to chance for all stimuli. It is confirmed that monaural cochlear implants are unable to support useful auditory sound localization, even when head movements are allowed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Bilateral cochlear implants aim to improve sound localization compared to monaural implants, among other potential benefits. Monaural cochlear implants should not support localization in the horizontal plane as there are no interaural level and time difference cues available, although some previous studies have suggested limited capability. As background to other studies of bilateral implantation, the localization abilities of 18 monaural cochlear implantees were investigated experimentally in an anechoic chamber, using various sound stimuli with different amounts of temporal information. The effects of head movement and reverberation were also investigated. Localization performance was found to be close to chance for all stimuli. It is confirmed that monaural cochlear implants are unable to support useful auditory sound localization, even when head movements are allowed.

Key concepts: Monaural, Sound localization, Cochlear implant, Anechoic chamber, Horizontal plane, Audiology, Reverberation, Noise (video)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Localization performance of unilateral cochlear implant users for speech, tones and noise — Research Paper | ScholarLens