2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Ongoing Support and Refinement of KPIs and CSFs

David Parmenter

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Many organizations have performed worthwhile key performance indicators (KPI) groundwork, only to have it fail or become buried when the originator leaves the organization. It is, therefore, important that the use of KPIs become widespread in an organization and that it be incorporated into its culture. Although most KPIs should always be maintained because of their relevance to the organization-wide critical success factors (CSFs), there will be some changes through constant improvement, refinement, and the introduction of a new CSF. To understand how this stage fits within the KPI methodology, an overview of the important work that needs to be done is presented in this chapter. There needs to be a careful process before there are any changes to the suite of CSFs and their associated measures. Teams will need to modify and change some of their KPIs and PIs as priorities change during their journey of process improvement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many organizations have performed worthwhile key performance indicators (KPI) groundwork, only to have it fail or become buried when the originator leaves the organization. It is, therefore, important that the use of KPIs become widespread in an organization and that it be incorporated into its culture. Although most KPIs should always be maintained because of their relevance to the organization-wide critical success factors (CSFs), there will be some changes through constant improvement, refinement, and the introduction of a new CSF. To understand how this stage fits within the KPI methodology, an overview of the important work that needs to be done is presented in this chapter. There needs to be a careful process before there are any changes to the suite of CSFs and their associated measures. Teams will need to modify and change some of their KPIs and PIs as priorities change during their journey of process improvement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many organizations have performed worthwhile key performance indicators (KPI) groundwork, only to have it fail or become buried when the originator leaves the organization. It is, therefore, important that the use of KPIs become widespread in an organization and that it be incorporated into its culture. Although most KPIs should always be maintained because of their relevance to the organization-wide critical success factors (CSFs), there will be some changes through constant improvement, refinement, and the introduction of a new CSF. To understand how this stage fits within the KPI methodology, an overview of the important work that needs to be done is presented in this chapter. There needs to be a careful process before there are any changes to the suite of CSFs and their associated measures. Teams will need to modify and change some of their KPIs and PIs as priorities change during their journey of process improvement.

Key concepts: Performance indicator, Process management, Relevance (law), Process (computing), Critical success factor, Work (physics), Suite, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ongoing Support and Refinement of KPIs and CSFs — Research Paper | ScholarLens