2004Journal of Clinical OncologyRequires access

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) combined with irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and fluorouracil (5-FU) compared with irinotecan, leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): Preliminary results of a multicenter randomized phase III trial

John Souglakos, N. Ziras, Alexandros Polyzos, Alekos Athanasiadis, Stelios Kakolyris, Th. Giannakakis, E. Tselepatiotis, Kostas Kalbakis, Nikolaos Vardakis, V. Georgoulias

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

3532 Background: In a phase II trial conducted from our group the 4-drug regimen (5FU+LV+CPT-11+L-OHP) was highly active and well tolerated (JCO 2002;20:2661–2667). A randomized trial was conducted to compare in terms of overall survival (OS) the 4-drug regimen (Arm-A) with the “standard” 3-drug (5FU+LV+CPT-11) FOLFIRI regimen (Arm-B) as first-line treatment in MCC Methods: Assuming OS 17months for Arm-B and 21 months for Arm-A, 276 pts were needed to show a significant difference (two-tailed log-rank test; a=0.05, b=0.8). For Arm-A CPT-11 150mg/m2 30–90 min infusion was given on d1, L-OHP 65mg/m2 2h infusion on d2, simultaneously but in different lines with LV 200mg/m2 on days 2+3 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2/d iv bolus and 600 mg/m2/d 22h infusion on days 2+3. For Arm-B CPT-11 180mg/m2 30–90 min infusion was given on d1, LV 200 mg/m2 on days 1+2 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2/d iv bolus and 600 mg/m2/d 22h infusion on days 1+2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Results: As of today 203 pts and 1673 cy of therapy were evaluable for safety and efficacy. 101 pts on Arm-A: M/F: 62/39, PS 0/1/2: 59/30/12, median age 65 (25–75).102 pts on Arm-B: M/F: 57/45, PS 0/1/2: 47/39/16, median age 66 (42–80). In an intention-to-treat analysis the response rate was 45% (95%CI 35,45%–55,27%) in Arm-A and 31% (95%CI 22,68%–41,24%) in Arm-B (p=0,055). In addition 32% of pts presented stable disease in Arm-A and 23% in Arm-B (p=0,147). Disease progression was observed in 23% of pts in Arm-A and 45% in Arm-B(p=0,001). Median TTP was 8.9 and 6.1 months (p=0,0958) and OS 21.1 and 16.5 months in Arm-A and Arm-B, respectively (Log rank=0,0956). Conclusions: These preliminary results show promising efficacy with acceptable safety for the 4-drug combination. Updated data will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

3532 Background: In a phase II trial conducted from our group the 4-drug regimen (5FU+LV+CPT-11+L-OHP) was highly active and well tolerated (JCO 2002;20:2661–2667). A randomized trial was conducted to compare in terms of overall survival (OS) the 4-drug regimen (Arm-A) with the “standard” 3-drug (5FU+LV+CPT-11) FOLFIRI regimen (Arm-B) as first-line treatment in MCC Methods: Assuming OS 17months for Arm-B and 21 months for Arm-A, 276 pts were needed to show a significant difference (two-tailed log-rank test; a=0.05, b=0.8). For Arm-A CPT-11 150mg/m2 30–90 min infusion was given on d1, L-OHP 65mg/m2 2h infusion on d2, simultaneously but in different lines with LV 200mg/m2 on days 2+3 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2/d iv bolus and 600 mg/m2/d 22h infusion on days 2+3. For Arm-B CPT-11 180mg/m2 30–90 min infusion was given on d1, LV 200 mg/m2 on days 1+2 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2/d iv bolus and 600 mg/m2/d 22h infusion on days 1+2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Results: As of today 203 pts and 1673 cy of therapy were evaluable for safety and efficacy. 101 pts on Arm-A: M/F: 62/39, PS 0/1/2: 59/30/12, median age 65 (25–75).102 pts on Arm-B: M/F: 57/45, PS 0/1/2: 47/39/16, median age 66 (42–80). In an intention-to-treat analysis the response rate was 45% (95%CI 35,45%–55,27%) in Arm-A and 31% (95%CI 22,68%–41,24%) in Arm-B (p=0,055). In addition 32% of pts presented stable disease in Arm-A and 23% in Arm-B (p=0,147). Disease progression was observed in 23% of pts in Arm-A and 45% in Arm-B(p=0,001). Median TTP was 8.9 and 6.1 months (p=0,0958) and OS 21.1 and 16.5 months in Arm-A and Arm-B, respectively (Log rank=0,0956). Conclusions: These preliminary results show promising efficacy with acceptable safety for the 4-drug combination. Updated data will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

3532 Background: In a phase II trial conducted from our group the 4-drug regimen (5FU+LV+CPT-11+L-OHP) was highly active and well tolerated (JCO 2002;20:2661–2667). A randomized trial was conducted to compare in terms of overall survival (OS) the 4-drug regimen (Arm-A) with the “standard” 3-drug (5FU+LV+CPT-11) FOLFIRI regimen (Arm-B) as first-line treatment in MCC Methods: Assuming OS 17months for Arm-B and 21 months for Arm-A, 276 pts were needed to show a significant difference (two-tailed log-rank test; a=0.05, b=0.8). For Arm-A CPT-11 150mg/m2 30–90 min infusion was given on d1, L-OHP 65mg/m2 2h infusion on d2, simultaneously but in different lines with LV 200mg/m2 on days 2+3 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2/d iv bolus and 600 mg/m2/d 22h infusion on days 2+3. For Arm-B CPT-11 180mg/m2 30–90 min infusion was given on d1, LV 200 mg/m2 on days 1+2 followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2/d iv bolus and 600 mg/m2/d 22h infusion on days 1+2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Results: As of today 203 pts and 1673 cy of therapy were evaluable for safety and efficacy. 101 pts on Arm-A: M/F: 62/39, PS 0/1/2: 59/30/12, median age 65 (25–75).102 pts on Arm-B: M/F: 57/45, PS 0/1/2: 47/39/16, median age 66 (42–80). In an intention-to-treat analysis the response rate was 45% (95%CI 35,45%–55,27%) in Arm-A and 31% (95%CI 22,68%–41,24%) in Arm-B (p=0,055). In addition 32% of pts presented stable disease in Arm-A and 23% in Arm-B (p=0,147). Disease progression was observed in 23% of pts in Arm-A and 45% in Arm-B(p=0,001). Median TTP was 8.9 and 6.1 months (p=0,0958) and OS 21.1 and 16.5 months in Arm-A and Arm-B, respectively (Log rank=0,0956). Conclusions: These preliminary results show promising efficacy with acceptable safety for the 4-drug combination. Updated data will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Key concepts: Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, Medicine, Oxaliplatin, Colorectal cancer, Internal medicine, Oncology, Chemotherapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) combined with irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and fluorouracil (5-FU) compared with irinotecan, leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): Preliminary results of a multicenter randomized phase III trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens