2003European Journal of AnaesthesiologyRequires access

Preoperative oral celecoxib versus preoperative oral rofecoxib for pain relief after thyroid surgery

Beyhan Karamanlıoğlu, Cavidan Arar, Ayşin Alagöl, Alkın Çolak, I. Gemlik, Necdet Süt

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Background and objective: The study compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of two preoperatively administered cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and rofecoxib. Methods: Ninety adult patients undergoing thyroid surgery were divided into three groups (each n = 30). They were given a single oral dose of placebo, celecoxib 200 mg or rofecoxib 50 mg 1 h before induction of anaesthesia. All patients received a standard anaesthetic. Intraoperative blood loss was measured. Pain scores, sedation scores, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and respiratory rate were noted at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively. Analgesic (meperidine) requirements and adverse effects were recorded during the first postoperative 24 h. Results: Compared with placebo, pain scores were significantly lower with rofecoxib at all time points (P < 0.05) and were significantly lower with celecoxib (P < 0.05) during the first 4h. Pain scores were significantly lower with rofecoxib compared with celecoxib at 6, 12 and 24h (P < 0.05). The average cumulative 24h meperidine dose was significantly lower with both celecoxib (54.9 ± 34.4mg) and rofecoxib (42.8 ± 40.9 mg) compared with placebo (76.8 ± 6.2 mg) (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There were no differences in the intraoperative blood loss, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, sedation scores and incidence of adverse effects among groups. Conclusions: The preoperative administration of rofecoxib 50mg and less so of celecoxib 200 mg provide a significant analgesic benefit with regard to postoperative pain relief and decrease in additional opioid requirements after thyroid surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background and objective: The study compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of two preoperatively administered cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and rofecoxib. Methods: Ninety adult patients undergoing thyroid surgery were divided into three groups (each n = 30). They were given a single oral dose of placebo, celecoxib 200 mg or rofecoxib 50 mg 1 h before induction of anaesthesia. All patients received a standard anaesthetic. Intraoperative blood loss was measured. Pain scores, sedation scores, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and respiratory rate were noted at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively. Analgesic (meperidine) requirements and adverse effects were recorded during the first postoperative 24 h. Results: Compared with placebo, pain scores were significantly lower with rofecoxib at all time points (P < 0.05) and were significantly lower with celecoxib (P < 0.05) during the first 4h. Pain scores were significantly lower with rofecoxib compared with celecoxib at 6, 12 and 24h (P < 0.05). The average cumulative 24h meperidine dose was significantly lower with both celecoxib (54.9 ± 34.4mg) and rofecoxib (42.8 ± 40.9 mg) compared with placebo (76.8 ± 6.2 mg) (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There were no differences in the intraoperative blood loss, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, sedation scores and incidence of adverse effects among groups. Conclusions: The preoperative administration of rofecoxib 50mg and less so of celecoxib 200 mg provide a significant analgesic benefit with regard to postoperative pain relief and decrease in additional opioid requirements after thyroid surgery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background and objective: The study compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of two preoperatively administered cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and rofecoxib. Methods: Ninety adult patients undergoing thyroid surgery were divided into three groups (each n = 30). They were given a single oral dose of placebo, celecoxib 200 mg or rofecoxib 50 mg 1 h before induction of anaesthesia. All patients received a standard anaesthetic. Intraoperative blood loss was measured. Pain scores, sedation scores, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and respiratory rate were noted at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively. Analgesic (meperidine) requirements and adverse effects were recorded during the first postoperative 24 h. Results: Compared with placebo, pain scores were significantly lower with rofecoxib at all time points (P < 0.05) and were significantly lower with celecoxib (P < 0.05) during the first 4h. Pain scores were significantly lower with rofecoxib compared with celecoxib at 6, 12 and 24h (P < 0.05). The average cumulative 24h meperidine dose was significantly lower with both celecoxib (54.9 ± 34.4mg) and rofecoxib (42.8 ± 40.9 mg) compared with placebo (76.8 ± 6.2 mg) (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There were no differences in the intraoperative blood loss, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, sedation scores and incidence of adverse effects among groups. Conclusions: The preoperative administration of rofecoxib 50mg and less so of celecoxib 200 mg provide a significant analgesic benefit with regard to postoperative pain relief and decrease in additional opioid requirements after thyroid surgery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Rofecoxib, Celecoxib, Anesthesia, Placebo, Analgesic, Sedation, Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preoperative oral celecoxib versus preoperative oral rofecoxib for pain relief after thyroid surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens