2006•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Resulting Trusts

Robert Chambers

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

This chapter argues that resulting trusts always arise to effect restitution of unjust enrichment. It then explains how that understanding of the resulting trust in its traditional categories can provide the paradigm for understanding all property rights to restitution of unjust enrichment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter argues that resulting trusts always arise to effect restitution of unjust enrichment. It then explains how that understanding of the resulting trust in its traditional categories can provide the paradigm for understanding all property rights to restitution of unjust enrichment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter argues that resulting trusts always arise to effect restitution of unjust enrichment. It then explains how that understanding of the resulting trust in its traditional categories can provide the paradigm for understanding all property rights to restitution of unjust enrichment.

Key concepts: Restitution, Unjust enrichment, Law and economics, Property (philosophy), Business, Law, Political science, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Resulting Trusts — Research Paper | ScholarLens