2018International Journal of Trade and Global MarketsRequires access

New approach to operational risk measurement in banks

Ewa Dziwok

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Greater globalisation and an increasing role of financial markets have a significant impact on the banking industry and the operational risk management (ORM) process. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) started to underline the importance of operational risk category and the capital requirements for the losses connected with operational risk (Basel II). Last financial crisis, which had enormous impact on financial markets caused the implementation of Basel III norms concerning regulatory capital requirements. The aim of this paper is to compare and assess different approaches for modelling an operational risk: the basic indicator approach (BIA) and the standardised approach (TSA), including its variant - the alternative standardised approach (ASA). The novelty of our approach lies in the critical analysis of these approaches from the viewpoint of capital measurement for operational risk.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Greater globalisation and an increasing role of financial markets have a significant impact on the banking industry and the operational risk management (ORM) process. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) started to underline the importance of operational risk category and the capital requirements for the losses connected with operational risk (Basel II). Last financial crisis, which had enormous impact on financial markets caused the implementation of Basel III norms concerning regulatory capital requirements. The aim of this paper is to compare and assess different approaches for modelling an operational risk: the basic indicator approach (BIA) and the standardised approach (TSA), including its variant - the alternative standardised approach (ASA). The novelty of our approach lies in the critical analysis of these approaches from the viewpoint of capital measurement for operational risk.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Greater globalisation and an increasing role of financial markets have a significant impact on the banking industry and the operational risk management (ORM) process. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) started to underline the importance of operational risk category and the capital requirements for the losses connected with operational risk (Basel II). Last financial crisis, which had enormous impact on financial markets caused the implementation of Basel III norms concerning regulatory capital requirements. The aim of this paper is to compare and assess different approaches for modelling an operational risk: the basic indicator approach (BIA) and the standardised approach (TSA), including its variant - the alternative standardised approach (ASA). The novelty of our approach lies in the critical analysis of these approaches from the viewpoint of capital measurement for operational risk.

Key concepts: Operational risk, Basel II, Risk-adjusted return on capital, Capital requirement, Risk management, Economic capital, Business, Risk-weighted asset

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New approach to operational risk measurement in banks — Research Paper | ScholarLens